Certified Adversarial Robustness Within Multiple Perturbation Bounds
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Randomized smoothing (RS) is a well known certified defense against adversarial attacks, which creates a smoothed classifier by predicting the most likely class under random noise perturbations of inputs during inference. While initial work focused on robustness to ℓ2 norm perturbations using noise sampled from a Gaussian distribution, subsequent works have shown that different noise distributions can result in robustness to other ℓp norm bounds as well. In general, a specific noise distribution is optimal for defending against a given ℓp norm based attack. In this work, we aim to improve the certified adversarial robustness against multiple perturbation bounds simultaneously. Towards this, we firstly present a novel textitcertification scheme, that effectively combines the certificates obtained using different noise distributions to obtain optimal results against multiple perturbation bounds. We further propose a novel textittraining noise distribution along with a textitregularized training scheme to improve the certification within both ℓ1 and ℓ2 perturbation norms simultaneously. Contrary to prior works, we compare the certified robustness of different training algorithms across the same natural (clean) accuracy, rather than across fixed noise levels used for training and certification. We also empirically invalidate the argument that training and certifying the classifier with the same amount of noise gives the best results. The proposed approach achieves improvements on the ACR (Average Certified Radius) metric across both ℓ1 and ℓ2 perturbation bounds.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2023.
Builds on
32 of 41 references.
References · 32
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
- 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 744
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
- 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 689
- 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 567
20 more
- 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 520
- 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 445
- 2017Mitigating Adversarial Effects Through Randomizationcited by 383
- 2018On the Effectiveness of Interval Bound Propagation for Training Verifiably Robust Modelscited by 328
- 2018Certified Defenses against Adversarial Examplescited by 306
- 2016Safety Verification of Deep Neural Networkscited by 263
- 2017PixelDefend: Leveraging Generative Models to Understand and Defend against Adversarial Examplescited by 244
- 2019Adversarial Training and Robustness for Multiple Perturbationscited by 183
- 2018Certified Adversarial Robustness with Additive Noisecited by 180
- 2020Randomized Smoothing of All Shapes and Sizescited by 147
- 2017An approach to reachability analysis for feed-forward ReLU neural networkscited by 127
- 2020MACER: Attack-free and Scalable Robust Training via Maximizing Certified Radiuscited by 114
- 2017Maximum Resilience of Artificial Neural Networkscited by 97
- 2020Consistency Regularization for Certified Robustness of Smoothed Classifierscited by 73
- 2020Guided Adversarial Attack for Evaluating and Enhancing Adversarial Defensescited by 62
- 2018Provable Robustness of ReLU networks via Maximization of Linear Regionscited by 51
- 2019Provable robustness against all adversarial lp-perturbations for p≥ 1cited by 39
- 2017Output Range Analysis for Deep Neural Networkscited by 30
- 2020Towards Achieving Adversarial Robustness by Enforcing Feature Consistency Across Bit Planescited by 15
- 2018MixTrain: Scalable Training of Verifiably Robust Neural Networkscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Privacy-preserving Universal Adversarial Defense for Black-box Modelscited by 3
- 2024Towards Generalized Certified Robustness with Multi-Norm Trainingcited by 1
- 2024Optimal Zero-Shot Detector for Multi-Armed Attackscited by 0
- 2026KAN-Robust-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 0
- 2026KAN-Robust-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks21 Aug 2026
- 2024Towards Generalized Certified Robustness with Multi-Norm Training3 Oct 2024
- 2024Privacy-preserving Universal Adversarial Defense for Black-box Models20 Aug 2024
- 2024Optimal Zero-Shot Detector for Multi-Armed Attacks24 Feb 2024