mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MixPro: Simple yet Effective Data Augmentation for Prompt-based Learning

arXiv 2304.09402 ↗First posted 19 Apr 2023cs.CL cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Prompt-based learning has shown considerable promise in reformulating various downstream tasks as cloze problems by combining original input with a predetermined template. This approach demonstrates its effectiveness, especially in few-shot learning scenarios, where the model is trained on a scarce amount of data. Despite its successes, the limited templates and text in few-shot prompt-based learning scenarios leave significant room for performance improvement. Moreover, existing methods sometimes resort to model ensembles, which, while effective, could potentially hamper model efficiency due to increased computational demands. To address these issues, we introduce MixPro, an augmentation method designed to augment both the vanilla input text and the templates. We implement this through the token-level, the sentence-level, and the template-level Mixup strategies. The experimental results on five few-shot datasets show that MixPro outperforms other augmentation baselines, improving model performance by an average of 5.08% compared to before augmentation.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 63 of its 100 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Apr 2023.

Builds on

63 of 100 references.

References · 63

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  5. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  6. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  7. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  8. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  9. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,772
  10. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  11. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
  12. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
38 more
  1. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
  2. 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,922
  3. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
  4. 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,255
  5. 2019TinyBERT: Distilling BERT for Natural Language Understandingcited by 1,153
  6. 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,057
  7. 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 953
  8. 2020Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inferencecited by 934
  9. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 897
  10. 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 800
  11. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
  12. 2021GPT Understands, Toocited by 715
  13. 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 709
  14. 2020It's Not Just Size That Matters: Small Language Models Are Also Few-Shot Learnerscited by 668
  15. 2021Multimodal Few-Shot Learning with Frozen Language Modelscited by 657
  16. 2020Fine-Tuning Pretrained Language Models: Weight Initializations, Data Orders, and Early Stoppingcited by 377
  17. 2021Learning How to Ask: Querying LMs with Mixtures of Soft Promptscited by 376
  18. 2018WiC: the Word-in-Context Dataset for Evaluating Context-Sensitive Meaning Representationscited by 370
  19. 2023Hard Prompts Made Easy: Gradient-Based Discrete Optimization for Prompt Tuning and Discoverycited by 329
  20. 2021Factual Probing Is [MASK]: Learning vs. Learning to Recallcited by 291
  21. 2020AutoPrompt: Eliciting Knowledge from Language Models with Automatically Generated Promptscited by 246
  22. 2021PTR: Prompt Tuning with Rules for Text Classificationcited by 238
  23. 2021WARP: Word-level Adversarial ReProgrammingcited by 220
  24. 2018ReCoRD: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Commonsense Reading Comprehensioncited by 198
  25. 2019Commonsense Knowledge Mining from Pretrained Modelscited by 189
  26. 2019Not Enough Data? Deep Learning to the Rescue!cited by 174
  27. 2019Structural Scaffolds for Citation Intent Classification in Scientific Publicationscited by 129
  28. 2021Adapting Language Models for Zero-shot Learning by Meta-tuning on Dataset and Prompt Collectionscited by 128
  29. 2019Augmenting Data with Mixup for Sentence Classification: An Empirical Studycited by 125
  30. 2017PubMed 200k RCT: a Dataset for Sequential Sentence Classification in Medical Abstractscited by 123
  31. 2021An Empirical Survey of Data Augmentation for Limited Data Learning in NLPcited by 101
  32. 2020Few-Shot Text Generation with Pattern-Exploiting Trainingcited by 87
  33. 2021BERTese: Learning to Speak to BERTcited by 82
  34. 2021Data Augmentation Approaches in Natural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 82
  35. 2020AdvAug: Robust Adversarial Augmentation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 66
  36. 2021PADA: Example-based Prompt Learning for on-the-fly Adaptation to Unseen Domainscited by 61
  37. 2022PromDA: Prompt-based Data Augmentation for Low-Resource NLU Taskscited by 51
  38. 2019Learning Data Manipulation for Augmentation and Weightingcited by 44

50 most cited of 63 All 63 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

4 papers.