mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Scalable Test Problem Generator for Sequential Transfer Optimization

arXiv 2304.08503 ↗First posted 17 Apr 2023cs.NE cs.AI cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sequential transfer optimization (STO), which aims to improve the optimization performance on a task of interest by exploiting the knowledge captured from several previously-solved optimization tasks stored in a database, has been gaining increasing research attention over the years. However, despite the remarkable advances in algorithm design, the development of a systematic benchmark suite for comprehensive comparisons of STO algorithms received far less attention. Existing test problems are either simply generated by assembling other benchmark functions or extended from specific practical problems with limited scalability. The relationships between the optimal solutions of the source and target tasks in these problems are also often manually configured, limiting their ability to model different similarity relationships presented in real-world problems. Consequently, the good performance achieved by an algorithm on these problems might be biased and hard to be generalized to other problems. In light of the above, in this study, we first introduce four concepts for characterizing STO problems and present an important problem feature, namely similarity distribution, which quantitatively delineates the relationship between the optima of the source and target tasks. Then, we present the general design guidelines of STO problems and a particular STO problem generator with good scalability. Specifically, the similarity distribution of a problem can be easily customized, enabling a continuous spectrum of representation of the diverse similarity relationships of real-world problems. Lastly, a benchmark suite with 12 STO problems featured by a variety of customized similarity relationships is developed using the proposed generator. The source code of the problem generator is available at https://github.com/XmingHsueh/STOP-G.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 91 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2023.

Builds on

13 of 91 references.

References · 13

  1. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  2. 2018Machine Learning for Combinatorial Optimization: a Methodological Tour d'Horizoncited by 612
  3. 2014ParamILS: An Automatic Algorithm Configuration Frameworkcited by 88
  4. 2019Meta-Learning Acquisition Functions for Transfer Learning in Bayesian Optimizationcited by 70
  5. 2021Few-Shot Bayesian Optimization with Deep Kernel Surrogatescited by 70
  6. 2020Neural Architecture Transfercited by 59
  7. 2018Regret bounds for meta Bayesian optimization with an unknown Gaussian process priorcited by 31
  8. 2021Transfer Learning with Gaussian Processes for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 26
  9. 2021An Overview and Experimental Study of Learning-based Optimization Algorithms for Vehicle Routing Problemcited by 22
  10. 2017Evolutionary Multitasking for Single-objective Continuous Optimization: Benchmark Problems, Performance Metric, and Baseline Resultscited by 10
  11. 2020Scalable Transfer Evolutionary Optimization: Coping with Big Task Instancescited by 6
  12. 2017Experience-based Optimization: A Coevolutionary Approachcited by 2
1 more
  1. 2023Experience-Based Evolutionary Algorithms for Expensive Optimizationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

5 papers.