mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Detection of Dense Subhypergraphs by Low-Degree Polynomials

arXiv 2304.08135 ↗First posted 17 Apr 2023cs.DS cs.CC math.STcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Detection of a planted dense subgraph in a random graph is a fundamental statistical and computational problem that has been extensively studied in recent years. We study a hypergraph version of the problem. Let Gr(n,p) denote the r-uniform ErdHos-R'enyi hypergraph model with n vertices and edge density p. We consider detecting the presence of a planted Gr(nγ, n-α) subhypergraph in a Gr(n, n-β) hypergraph, where 0< α < β < r-1 and 0 < γ < 1. Focusing on tests that are degree-no(1) polynomials of the entries of the adjacency tensor, we determine the threshold between the easy and hard regimes for the detection problem. More precisely, for 0 < γ < 1/2, the threshold is given by α = β γ, and for 1/2 ≤ γ < 1, the threshold is given by α = β/2 + r(γ - 1/2). Our results are already new in the graph case r=2, as we consider the subtle log-density regime where hardness based on average-case reductions is not known. Our proof of low-degree hardness is based on a conditional variant of the standard low-degree likelihood calculation.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2023.

Builds on

28 of 69 references.

References · 28

  1. 2019Notes on Computational Hardness of Hypothesis Testing: Predictions using the Low-Degree Likelihood Ratiocited by 82
  2. 2017The power of sum-of-squares for detecting hidden structurescited by 54
  3. 2020Reducibility and Statistical-Computational Gaps from Secret Leakagecited by 50
  4. 2020Computational Barriers to Estimation from Low-Degree Polynomialscited by 38
  5. 2018Reducibility and Computational Lower Bounds for Problems with Planted Sparse Structurecited by 35
  6. 2022The Franz-Parisi Criterion and Computational Trade-offs in High Dimensional Statisticscited by 31
  7. 2019Computational Hardness of Certifying Bounds on Constrained PCA Problemscited by 30
  8. 2014Statistical-Computational Tradeoffs in Planted Problems and Submatrix Localization with a Growing Number of Clusters and Submatricescited by 29
  9. 2020Tensor Clustering with Planted Structures: Statistical Optimality and Computational Limitscited by 29
  10. 2017Bayesian estimation from few samples: community detection and related problemscited by 28
  11. 2014Computational Lower Bounds for Community Detection on Random Graphscited by 21
  12. 2015Information Limits for Recovering a Hidden Communitycited by 18
16 more
  1. 2019Local Statistics, Semidefinite Programming, and Community Detectioncited by 14
  2. 2019Universality of Computational Lower Bounds for Submatrix Detectioncited by 13
  3. 2020Spectral Planting and the Hardness of Refuting Cuts, Colorability, and Communities in Random Graphscited by 13
  4. 2013Community Detection in Sparse Random Networkscited by 11
  5. 2016The Densest k-Subhypergraph Problemcited by 10
  6. 2016Average-case Hardness of RIP Certificationcited by 10
  7. 2022Statistical and Computational Phase Transitions in Group Testingcited by 10
  8. 2015Finding One Community in a Sparse Graphcited by 8
  9. 2023A Survey on the Densest Subgraph Problem and Its Variantscited by 8
  10. 2023Is Planted Coloring Easier than Planted Clique?cited by 7
  11. 2020Statistical and computational thresholds for the planted k-densest sub-hypergraph problemcited by 5
  12. 2021Sharp detection boundaries on testing dense subhypergraphcited by 5
  13. 2018Sherali-Adams Integrality Gaps Matching the Log-Density Thresholdcited by 2
  14. 2020Average-Case Integrality Gap for Non-Negative Principal Component Analysiscited by 2
  15. 2021Heterogeneous Dense Subhypergraph Detectioncited by 2
  16. 2021Information Limits for Detecting a Subhypergraphcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 4.

7 papers.