mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Oh, Jeez! or Uh-huh? A Listener-aware Backchannel Predictor on ASR Transcriptions

arXiv 2304.04478 ↗First posted 10 Apr 2023cs.CL cs.SD eess.AScited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents our latest investigation on modeling backchannel in conversations. Motivated by a proactive backchanneling theory, we aim at developing a system which acts as a proactive listener by inserting backchannels, such as continuers and assessment, to influence speakers. Our model takes into account not only lexical and acoustic cues, but also introduces the simple and novel idea of using listener embeddings to mimic different backchanneling behaviours. Our experimental results on the Switchboard benchmark dataset reveal that acoustic cues are more important than lexical cues in this task and their combination with listener embeddings works best on both, manual transcriptions and automatically generated transcriptions.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2023.

Builds on

2 of 28 references.

References · 2

  1. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  2. 2018Lexico-acoustic Neural-based Models for Dialog Act Classificationcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.

6 papers.