mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Exponentially improved efficient machine learning for quantum many-body states with provable guarantees

arXiv 2304.04353 ↗First posted 10 Apr 2023quant-ph cs.LG physics.data-ancited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Solving the ground state and the ground-state properties of quantum many-body systems is generically a hard task for classical algorithms. For a family of Hamiltonians defined on an m-dimensional space of physical parameters, the ground state and its properties at an arbitrary parameter configuration can be predicted via a machine learning protocol up to a prescribed prediction error varepsilon, provided that a sample set (of size N) of the states can be efficiently prepared and measured. In a recent work [Huang et al., Science 377, eabk3333 (2022)], a rigorous guarantee for such a generalization was proved. Unfortunately, an exponential scaling for the provable sample complexity, N=m^calOleft(frac1varepsilonright), was found to be universal for generic gapped Hamiltonians. This result applies to the situation where the dimension of the parameter space is large while the scaling with the accuracy is not an urgent factor. In this work, we consider an alternative scenario where m is a finite, not necessarily large constant while the scaling with the prediction error becomes the central concern. By jointly preserving the fundamental properties of density matrices in the learning protocol and utilizing the continuity of quantum states in the parameter range of interest, we rigorously obtain a polynomial sample complexity for predicting quantum many-body states and their properties, with respect to the uniform prediction error varepsilon and the number of qubits n. Moreover, if restricted to learning local quantum-state properties, the number of samples with respect to n can be further reduced exponentially. Our results provide theoretical guarantees for efficient learning of quantum many-body states and their properties, with model-independent applications not restricted to ground states of gapped Hamiltonians.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 135 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2023.

Builds on

31 of 135 references.

References · 31

  1. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
  2. 2016Quantum Machine Learningcited by 326
  3. 2020Predicting Many Properties of a Quantum System from Very Few Measurementscited by 233
  4. 2021Supervised quantum machine learning models are kernel methodscited by 200
  5. 2018A high-bias, low-variance introduction to Machine Learning for physicistscited by 108
  6. 2021Provably efficient machine learning for quantum many-body problemscited by 91
  7. 2019Deep autoregressive models for the efficient variational simulation of many-body quantum systemscited by 64
  8. 2016Discovering Phase Transitions with Unsupervised Learningcited by 49
  9. 2017Unsupervised learning of phase transitions: from principal component analysis to variational autoencoderscited by 47
  10. 2020Quantum State Tomography with Conditional Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 41
  11. 2017Equivalence of restricted Boltzmann machines and tensor network statescited by 27
  12. 2023Improved machine learning algorithm for predicting ground state propertiescited by 22
19 more
  1. 2019Experimental kernel-based quantum machine learning in finite feature spacecited by 21
  2. 2021Efficient estimation of Pauli observables by derandomizationcited by 20
  3. 2017Machine Learning Topological Invariants with Neural Networkscited by 19
  4. 2019Experimental neural network enhanced quantum tomographycited by 18
  5. 2020Classification and reconstruction of optical quantum states with deep neural networkscited by 17
  6. 2019Geometry of learning neural quantum statescited by 14
  7. 2020Machine learning assisted quantum state estimationcited by 13
  8. 2014A Unifying Framework in Vector-valued Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces for Manifold Regularization and Co-Regularized Multi-view Learningcited by 12
  9. 2018Deep Learning Topological Invariants of Band Insulatorscited by 10
  10. 2021Learning Temporal Quantum Tomographycited by 9
  11. 2019Inferring the quantum density matrix with machine learningcited by 8
  12. 2019Unveiling phase transitions with machine learningcited by 7
  13. 2020Reinforcement Learning for Many-Body Ground-State Preparation Inspired by Counterdiabatic Drivingcited by 6
  14. 2018Bounding Multivariate Trigonometric Polynomials with Applications to Filter Bank Designcited by 5
  15. 2020Unsupervised machine learning of quantum phase transitions using diffusion mapscited by 5
  16. 2017Learning Disordered Topological Phases by Statistical Recovery of Symmetrycited by 3
  17. 2018Boltzmann Generators -- Sampling Equilibrium States of Many-Body Systems with Deep Learningcited by 3
  18. 2020Probing Criticality in Quantum Spin Chains with Neural Networkscited by 3
  19. 2022Estimating the Euclidean quantum propagator with deep generative modeling of Feynman pathscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 4.

7 papers.