mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AI Model Disgorgement: Methods and Choices

arXiv 2304.03545 ↗First posted 7 Apr 2023cs.LG cs.CRcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Responsible use of data is an indispensable part of any machine learning (ML) implementation. ML developers must carefully collect and curate their datasets, and document their provenance. They must also make sure to respect intellectual property rights, preserve individual privacy, and use data in an ethical way. Over the past few years, ML models have significantly increased in size and complexity. These models require a very large amount of data and compute capacity to train, to the extent that any defects in the training corpus cannot be trivially remedied by retraining the model from scratch. Despite sophisticated controls on training data and a significant amount of effort dedicated to ensuring that training corpora are properly composed, the sheer volume of data required for the models makes it challenging to manually inspect each datum comprising a training corpus. One potential fix for training corpus data defects is model disgorgement -- the elimination of not just the improperly used data, but also the effects of improperly used data on any component of an ML model. Model disgorgement techniques can be used to address a wide range of issues, such as reducing bias or toxicity, increasing fidelity, and ensuring responsible usage of intellectual property. In this paper, we introduce a taxonomy of possible disgorgement methods that are applicable to modern ML systems. In particular, we investigate the meaning of "removing the effects" of data in the trained model in a way that does not require retraining from scratch.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2023.

Builds on

23 of 44 references.

References · 23

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  3. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  4. 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,057
  5. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
  6. 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 774
  7. 2019Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 599
  8. 2019Does Learning Require Memorization? A Short Tale about a Long Tailcited by 452
  9. 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 447
  10. 2020Sim-to-Real Transfer in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotics: a Surveycited by 388
  11. 2020Influence Functions in Deep Learning Are Fragilecited by 247
  12. 2023Glaze: Protecting Artists from Style Mimicry by Text-to-Image Modelscited by 200
11 more
  1. 2020Forgetting Outside the Box: Scrubbing Deep Networks of Information Accessible from Input-Output Observationscited by 171
  2. 2021Adaptive Machine Unlearningcited by 164
  3. 2020Mixed-Privacy Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 158
  4. 2020When is Memorization of Irrelevant Training Data Necessary for High-Accuracy Learning?cited by 102
  5. 2020Towards Backward-Compatible Representation Learningcited by 74
  6. 2020Positive-Congruent Training: Towards Regression-Free Model Updatescited by 55
  7. 2022Mixed Differential Privacy in Computer Visioncited by 53
  8. 2019Where is the Information in a Deep Neural Network?cited by 40
  9. 2020An Empirical Analysis of Backward Compatibility in Machine Learning Systemscited by 38
  10. 2022Privacy Adhering Machine Un-learning in NLPcited by 35
  11. 2021Estimating informativeness of samples with Smooth Unique Informationcited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

9 papers.