mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Source-free Domain Adaptation Requires Penalized Diversity

arXiv 2304.02798 ↗First posted 6 Apr 2023cs.LG cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While neural networks are capable of achieving human-like performance in many tasks such as image classification, the impressive performance of each model is limited to its own dataset. Source-free domain adaptation (SFDA) was introduced to address knowledge transfer between different domains in the absence of source data, thus, increasing data privacy. Diversity in representation space can be vital to a model`s adaptability in varied and difficult domains. In unsupervised SFDA, the diversity is limited to learning a single hypothesis on the source or learning multiple hypotheses with a shared feature extractor. Motivated by the improved predictive performance of ensembles, we propose a novel unsupervised SFDA algorithm that promotes representational diversity through the use of separate feature extractors with Distinct Backbone Architectures (DBA). Although diversity in feature space is increased, the unconstrained mutual information (MI) maximization may potentially introduce amplification of weak hypotheses. Thus we introduce the Weak Hypothesis Penalization (WHP) regularizer as a mitigation strategy. Our work proposes Penalized Diversity (PD) where the synergy of DBA and WHP is applied to unsupervised source-free domain adaptation for covariate shift. In addition, PD is augmented with a weighted MI maximization objective for label distribution shift. Empirical results on natural, synthetic, and medical domains demonstrate the effectiveness of PD under different distributional shifts.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2023.

Builds on

43 of 71 references.

References · 43

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  4. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  5. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  6. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
  7. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
  8. 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,906
  9. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
  10. 2015Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networkscited by 1,323
  11. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
  12. 2017Deep Hashing Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 1,181
31 more
  1. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,054
  2. 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 844
  3. 2019A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 555
  4. 2015Variational Dropout and the Local Reparameterization Trickcited by 489
  5. 2019Deep Ensembles: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 438
  6. 2021Domain Adaptation for Medical Image Analysis: A Surveycited by 351
  7. 2019Bridging Theory and Algorithm for Domain Adaptationcited by 332
  8. 2016Revisiting Batch Normalization For Practical Domain Adaptationcited by 285
  9. 2020Do Wide and Deep Networks Learn the Same Things? Uncovering How Neural Network Representations Vary with Width and Depthcited by 241
  10. 2020Pitfalls of In-Domain Uncertainty Estimation and Ensembling in Deep Learningcited by 208
  11. 2021Exploiting the Intrinsic Neighborhood Structure for Source-free Domain Adaptationcited by 176
  12. 2021Generalized Source-free Domain Adaptationcited by 175
  13. 2015End-to-End Attention-based Large Vocabulary Speech Recognitioncited by 148
  14. 2020Domain Adaptation with Conditional Distribution Matching and Generalized Label Shiftcited by 124
  15. 2019Regularized Learning for Domain Adaptation under Label Shiftscited by 118
  16. 2019Cluster Alignment with a Teacher for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 88
  17. 2022Agree to Disagree: Diversity through Disagreement for Better Transferabilitycited by 69
  18. 2020Depth Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 56
  19. 2020Neural Ensemble Search for Uncertainty Estimation and Dataset Shiftcited by 56
  20. 2022Diversify and Disambiguate: Learning From Underspecified Datacited by 55
  21. 2018A Lifelong Learning Approach to Brain MR Segmentation Across Scanners and Protocolscited by 49
  22. 2021DICE: Diversity in Deep Ensembles via Conditional Redundancy Adversarial Estimationcited by 48
  23. 2016Hypothesis Transfer Learning via Transformation Functionscited by 26
  24. 2019A Closer Look at Domain Shift for Deep Learning in Histopathologycited by 25
  25. 2021Aggregating From Multiple Target-Shifted Sourcescited by 24
  26. 2020Diverse Ensembles Improve Calibrationcited by 23
  27. 2021UMAD: Universal Model Adaptation under Domain and Category Shiftcited by 23
  28. 2020Optimal Transport for Conditional Domain Matching and Label Shiftcited by 20
  29. 2021Mapping conditional distributions for domain adaptation under generalized target shiftcited by 18
  30. 2014Fast Rates by Transferring from Auxiliary Hypothesescited by 16
  31. 2020Hypothesis Disparity Regularized Mutual Information Maximizationcited by 15

Built on by

Not cited yet.