mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Transformer-Based Deep Learning Approach for Fairly Predicting Post-Liver Transplant Risk Factors

arXiv 2304.02780 ↗First posted 5 Apr 2023cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Liver transplantation is a life-saving procedure for patients with end-stage liver disease. There are two main challenges in liver transplant: finding the best matching patient for a donor and ensuring transplant equity among different subpopulations. The current MELD scoring system evaluates a patient's mortality risk if not receiving an organ within 90 days. However, the donor-patient matching should also consider post-transplant risk factors, such as cardiovascular disease, chronic rejection, etc., which are all common complications after transplant. Accurate prediction of these risk scores remains a significant challenge. In this study, we used predictive models to solve the above challenges. Specifically, we proposed a deep-learning model to predict multiple risk factors after a liver transplant. By formulating it as a multi-task learning problem, the proposed deep neural network was trained to simultaneously predict the five post-transplant risks and achieve equal good performance by exploiting task-balancing techniques. We also proposed a novel fairness-achieving algorithm to ensure prediction fairness across different subpopulations. We used electronic health records of 160,360 liver transplant patients, including demographic information, clinical variables, and laboratory values, collected from the liver transplant records of the United States from 1987 to 2018. The model's performance was evaluated using various performance metrics such as AUROC and AUPRC. Our experiment results highlighted the success of our multitask model in achieving task balance while maintaining accuracy. The model significantly reduced the task discrepancy by 39%. Further application of the fairness-achieving algorithm substantially reduced fairness disparity among all sensitive attributes (gender, age group, and race/ethnicity) in each risk factor.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2023.

Builds on

13 of 38 references.

References · 13

  1. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  3. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,256
  4. 2017A Survey on Multi-Task Learningcited by 840
  5. 2020TabTransformer: Tabular Data Modeling Using Contextual Embeddingscited by 409
  6. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  7. 2022Multi-Task Learning as a Bargaining Gamecited by 215
  8. 2017Natural Language Processing: State of The Art, Current Trends and Challengescited by 114
  9. 2017Optimized Data Pre-Processing for Discrimination Preventioncited by 12
  10. 2021Emotion Recognition with Incomplete Labels Using Modified Multi-task Learning Techniquecited by 10
  11. 2020Multitask Learning with Single Gradient Step Update for Task Balancingcited by 9
  12. 2023Fairly Predicting Graft Failure in Liver Transplant for Organ Assigningcited by 7
1 more
  1. 2023Multi-Task Learning for Post-transplant Cause of Death Analysis: A Case Study on Liver Transplantcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

4 papers.