Quantifying the Roles of Visual, Linguistic, and Visual-Linguistic Complexity in Verb Acquisition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Children typically learn the meanings of nouns earlier than the meanings of verbs. However, it is unclear whether this asymmetry is a result of complexity in the visual structure of categories in the world to which language refers, the structure of language itself, or the interplay between the two sources of information. We quantitatively test these three hypotheses regarding early verb learning by employing visual and linguistic representations of words sourced from large-scale pre-trained artificial neural networks. Examining the structure of both visual and linguistic embedding spaces, we find, first, that the representation of verbs is generally more variable and less discriminable within domain than the representation of nouns. Second, we find that if only one learning instance per category is available, visual and linguistic representations are less well aligned in the verb system than in the noun system. However, in parallel with the course of human language development, if multiple learning instances per category are available, visual and linguistic representations become almost as well aligned in the verb system as in the noun system. Third, we compare the relative contributions of factors that may predict learning difficulty for individual words. A regression analysis reveals that visual variability is the strongest factor that internally drives verb learning, followed by visual-linguistic alignment and linguistic variability. Based on these results, we conclude that verb acquisition is influenced by all three sources of complexity, but that the variability of visual structure poses the most significant challenge for verb learning.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2023.
Builds on
11 of 63 references.
References · 11
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,845
- 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
- 2014SimLex-999: Evaluating Semantic Models with (Genuine) Similarity Estimationcited by 170
- 2019Learning as the Unsupervised Alignment of Conceptual Systemscited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.