mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A dynamic Bayesian optimized active recommender system for curiosity-driven Human-in-the-loop automated experiments

arXiv 2304.02484 ↗First posted 5 Apr 2023cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Optimization of experimental materials synthesis and characterization through active learning methods has been growing over the last decade, with examples ranging from measurements of diffraction on combinatorial alloys at synchrotrons, to searches through chemical space with automated synthesis robots for perovskites. In virtually all cases, the target property of interest for optimization is defined apriori with limited human feedback during operation. In contrast, here we present the development of a new type of human in the loop experimental workflow, via a Bayesian optimized active recommender system (BOARS), to shape targets on the fly, employing human feedback. We showcase examples of this framework applied to pre-acquired piezoresponse force spectroscopy of a ferroelectric thin film, and then implement this in real time on an atomic force microscope, where the optimization proceeds to find symmetric piezoresponse amplitude hysteresis loops. It is found that such features appear more affected by subsurface defects than the local domain structure. This work shows the utility of human-augmented machine learning approaches for curiosity-driven exploration of systems across experimental domains. The analysis reported here is summarized in Colab Notebook for the purpose of tutorial and application to other data: https://github.com/arpanbiswas52/varTBO

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2023.

Builds on

12 of 65 references.

References · 12

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2015Deep Kernel Learningcited by 440
  3. 2013Bayesian Optimization in a Billion Dimensions via Random Embeddingscited by 178
  4. 2021A survey on high-dimensional Gaussian process modeling with application to Bayesian optimizationcited by 76
  5. 2018BOCK : Bayesian Optimization with Cylindrical Kernelscited by 62
  6. 2021High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimisation with Variational Autoencoders and Deep Metric Learningcited by 54
  7. 2017Constrained Bayesian Optimization for Automatic Chemical Designcited by 20
  8. 2021Bayesian Optimization in Materials Science: A Surveycited by 9
  9. 2022Disentangling multiple scattering with deep learning: application to strain mapping from electron diffraction patternscited by 7
  10. 2022Optimizing Training Trajectories in Variational Autoencoders via Latent Bayesian Optimization Approachcited by 7
  11. 2022Active learning in open experimental environments: selecting the right information channel(s) based on predictability in deep kernel learningcited by 5
  12. 2021A Nested Weighted Tchebycheff Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization Approach for Flexibility of Unknown Utopia Estimation in Expensive Black-box Design Problemscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.