mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Clustering Validation with The Area Under Precision-Recall Curves

arXiv 2304.01450 ↗First posted 4 Apr 2023cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Confusion matrices and derived metrics provide a comprehensive framework for the evaluation of model performance in machine learning. These are well-known and extensively employed in the supervised learning domain, particularly classification. Surprisingly, such a framework has not been fully explored in the context of clustering validation. Indeed, just recently such a gap has been bridged with the introduction of the Area Under the ROC Curve for Clustering (AUCC), an internal/relative Clustering Validation Index (CVI) that allows for clustering validation in real application scenarios. In this work we explore the Area Under Precision-Recall Curve (and related metrics) in the context of clustering validation. We show that these are not only appropriate as CVIs, but should also be preferred in the presence of cluster imbalance. We perform a comprehensive evaluation of proposed and state-of-art CVIs on real and simulated data sets. Our observations corroborate towards an unified validation framework for supervised and unsupervised learning, given that they are consistent with existing guidelines established for the evaluation of supervised learning models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2023.

Builds on

2 of 43 references.

References · 2

  1. 2020Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlationcited by 425
  2. 2020The Area Under the ROC Curve as a Measure of Clustering Qualitycited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.