mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Belief, knowledge and evidence

arXiv 2304.01283 ↗First posted 3 Apr 2023cs.LO cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a logical system that combines the well-known classical epistemic concepts of belief and knowledge with a concept of evidence such that the intuitive principle textit`evidence yields belief and knowledge' is satisfied. Our approach relies on previous works of the first author citelewjlc2, lewigpl, lewapal who introduced a modal system containing S5-style principles for the reasoning about intutionistic truth (i.e. textitproof) and, inspired by citeartpro, combined that system with concepts of textitintuitionistic belief and knowledge. We consider that combined system and replace the constructive concept of textitproof with a classical notion of textitevidence. This results in a logic that combines modal system S5 with classical epistemic principles where squarevarphi reads as `varphi is evident' in an epistemic sense. Inspired by citelewapal, and in contrast to the usual possible worlds semantics found in the literature, we propose here a relational, frame-based semantics where belief and knowledge are not modeled via accessibility relations but directly as sets of propositions (sets of sets of worlds).

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2023.

Builds on

3 of 10 references.

References · 3

  1. 2013A modal logic amalgam of classical and intuitionistic propositional logiccited by 2
  2. 2016Epistemic extensions of combined classical and intuitionistic propositional logiccited by 1
  3. 2017Reasoning about proof and knowledgecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.