mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Discovering and Explaining the Non-Causality of Deep Learning in SAR ATR

arXiv 2304.00668 ↗First posted 3 Apr 2023cs.CV cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, deep learning has been widely used in SAR ATR and achieved excellent performance on the MSTAR dataset. However, due to constrained imaging conditions, MSTAR has data biases such as background correlation, i.e., background clutter properties have a spurious correlation with target classes. Deep learning can overfit clutter to reduce training errors. Therefore, the degree of overfitting for clutter reflects the non-causality of deep learning in SAR ATR. Existing methods only qualitatively analyze this phenomenon. In this paper, we quantify the contributions of different regions to target recognition based on the Shapley value. The Shapley value of clutter measures the degree of overfitting. Moreover, we explain how data bias and model bias contribute to non-causality. Concisely, data bias leads to comparable signal-to-clutter ratios and clutter textures in training and test sets. And various model structures have different degrees of overfitting for these biases. The experimental results of various models under standard operating conditions on the MSTAR dataset support our conclusions. Our code is available at https://github.com/waterdisappear/Data-Bias-in-MSTAR.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2023.

Builds on

12 of 36 references.

References · 12

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  4. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  5. 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 341
  6. 2019Approximating CNNs with Bag-of-local-Features models works surprisingly well on ImageNetcited by 260
  7. 2020A Survey on Causal Inferencecited by 202
  8. 2020Informative Dropout for Robust Representation Learning: A Shape-bias Perspectivecited by 57
  9. 2018From BoW to CNN: Two Decades of Texture Representation for Texture Classificationcited by 39
  10. 2017Examining CNN Representations with respect to Dataset Biascited by 27
  11. 2020Automatic Target Recognition on Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery: A Surveycited by 18
  12. 2022Scattering Model Guided Adversarial Examples for SAR Target Recognition: Attack and Defensecited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

9 papers.