Multimodal Hyperspectral Image Classification via Interconnected Fusion
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing multiple modality fusion methods, such as concatenation, summation, and encoder-decoder-based fusion, have recently been employed to combine modality characteristics of Hyperspectral Image (HSI) and Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR). However, these methods consider the relationship of HSI-LiDAR signals from limited perspectives. More specifically, they overlook the contextual information across modalities of HSI and LiDAR and the intra-modality characteristics of LiDAR. In this paper, we provide a new insight into feature fusion to explore the relationships across HSI and LiDAR modalities comprehensively. An Interconnected Fusion (IF) framework is proposed. Firstly, the center patch of the HSI input is extracted and replicated to the size of the HSI input. Then, nine different perspectives in the fusion matrix are generated by calculating self-attention and cross-attention among the replicated center patch, HSI input, and corresponding LiDAR input. In this way, the intra- and inter-modality characteristics can be fully exploited, and contextual information is considered in both intra-modality and inter-modality manner. These nine interrelated elements in the fusion matrix can complement each other and eliminate biases, which can generate a multi-modality representation for classification accurately. Extensive experiments have been conducted on three widely used datasets: Trento, MUUFL, and Houston. The IF framework achieves state-of-the-art results on these datasets compared to existing approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2023.
Builds on
15 of 42 references.
References · 15
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
- 2020A Survey on Visual Transformercited by 653
- 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
- 2022Multimodal Learning with Transformers: A Surveycited by 399
- 2019What Makes Training Multi-Modal Classification Networks Hard?cited by 340
- 2021Deep ViT Features as Dense Visual Descriptorscited by 327
- 2021SpectralFormer: Rethinking Hyperspectral Image Classification with Transformerscited by 168
- 2020More Diverse Means Better: Multimodal Deep Learning Meets Remote Sensing Imagery Classificationcited by 126
- 2022Deep Learning in Multimodal Remote Sensing Data Fusion: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 73
- 2022Multimodal Fusion Transformer for Remote Sensing Image Classificationcited by 61
- 2016Going Deeper with Contextual CNN for Hyperspectral Image Classificationcited by 58
3 more
- 2021Multimodal Remote Sensing Benchmark Datasets for Land Cover Classification with A Shared and Specific Feature Learning Modelcited by 43
- 2021ConvNets vs. Transformers: Whose Visual Representations are More Transferable?cited by 35
- 2020Classification of Hyperspectral and LiDAR Data Using Coupled CNNscited by 25
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.