mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Selective Knowledge Distillation for Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation

arXiv 2303.17910 ↗First posted 31 Mar 2023cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Benefiting from the sequence-level knowledge distillation, the Non-Autoregressive Transformer (NAT) achieves great success in neural machine translation tasks. However, existing knowledge distillation has side effects, such as propagating errors from the teacher to NAT students, which may limit further improvements of NAT models and are rarely discussed in existing research. In this paper, we introduce selective knowledge distillation by introducing an NAT evaluator to select NAT-friendly targets that are of high quality and easy to learn. In addition, we introduce a simple yet effective progressive distillation method to boost NAT performance. Experiment results on multiple WMT language directions and several representative NAT models show that our approach can realize a flexible trade-off between the quality and complexity of training data for NAT models, achieving strong performances. Further analysis shows that distilling only 5% of the raw translations can help an NAT outperform its counterpart trained on raw data by about 2.4 BLEU.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2023.

Builds on

24 of 34 references.

References · 24

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  3. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
  4. 2016Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillationcited by 761
  5. 2017Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translationcited by 457
  6. 2018Deterministic Non-Autoregressive Neural Sequence Modeling by Iterative Refinementcited by 194
  7. 2019Understanding Knowledge Distillation in Non-autoregressive Machine Translationcited by 121
  8. 2020Deep Encoder, Shallow Decoder: Reevaluating Non-autoregressive Machine Translationcited by 104
  9. 2018Fast Decoding in Sequence Models using Discrete Latent Variablescited by 103
  10. 2019FlowSeq: Non-Autoregressive Conditional Sequence Generation with Generative Flowcited by 89
  11. 2020Understanding and Improving Lexical Choice in Non-Autoregressive Translationcited by 55
  12. 2019Non-Autoregressive Machine Translation with Auxiliary Regularizationcited by 52
12 more
  1. 2022Directed Acyclic Transformer for Non-Autoregressive Machine Translationcited by 44
  2. 2020On the Importance of Word and Sentence Representation Learning in Implicit Discourse Relation Classificationcited by 40
  3. 2019Fine-Tuning by Curriculum Learning for Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translationcited by 39
  4. 2019Imitation Learning for Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translationcited by 36
  5. 2021Rejuvenating Low-Frequency Words: Making the Most of Parallel Data in Non-Autoregressive Translationcited by 34
  6. 2021Non-Autoregressive Translation by Learning Target Categorical Codescited by 25
  7. 2016A Curriculum Learning Method for Improved Noise Robustness in Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 23
  8. 2020An EM Approach to Non-autoregressive Conditional Sequence Generationcited by 21
  9. 2022textitlatent-GLAT: Glancing at Latent Variables for Parallel Text Generationcited by 20
  10. 2022One Reference Is Not Enough: Diverse Distillation with Reference Selection for Non-Autoregressive Translationcited by 20
  11. 2019Syntactically Supervised Transformers for Faster Neural Machine Translationcited by 19
  12. 2021The Volctrans GLAT System: Non-autoregressive Translation Meets WMT21cited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.