mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SDAT: Sub-Dataset Alternation Training for Improved Image Demosaicing

arXiv 2303.15792 ↗First posted 28 Mar 2023eess.IV cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Image demosaicing is an important step in the image processing pipeline for digital cameras. In data centric approaches, such as deep learning, the distribution of the dataset used for training can impose a bias on the networks' outcome. For example, in natural images most patches are smooth, and high-content patches are much rarer. This can lead to a bias in the performance of demosaicing algorithms. Most deep learning approaches address this challenge by utilizing specific losses or designing special network architectures. We propose a novel approach, SDAT, Sub-Dataset Alternation Training, that tackles the problem from a training protocol perspective. SDAT is comprised of two essential phases. In the initial phase, we employ a method to create sub-datasets from the entire dataset, each inducing a distinct bias. The subsequent phase involves an alternating training process, which uses the derived sub-datasets in addition to training also on the entire dataset. SDAT can be applied regardless of the chosen architecture as demonstrated by various experiments we conducted for the demosaicing task. The experiments are performed across a range of architecture sizes and types, namely CNNs and transformers. We show improved performance in all cases. We are also able to achieve state-of-the-art results on three highly popular image demosaicing benchmarks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2023.

Builds on

19 of 41 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
  3. 2016Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 1,908
  4. 2021SwinIR: Image Restoration Using Swin Transformercited by 1,887
  5. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,512
  6. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
  7. 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
  8. 2020Plug-and-Play Image Restoration with Deep Denoiser Priorcited by 470
  9. 2019Residual Non-local Attention Networks for Image Restorationcited by 236
  10. 2023Efficient and Explicit Modelling of Image Hierarchies for Image Restorationcited by 145
  11. 2020Frequency Bias in Neural Networks for Input of Non-Uniform Densitycited by 140
  12. 2021Dynamic Attentive Graph Learning for Image Restorationcited by 48
7 more
  1. 2017Cognitive Psychology for Deep Neural Networks: A Shape Bias Case Studycited by 46
  2. 2018Deep Image Demosaicking using a Cascade of Convolutional Residual Denoising Networkscited by 31
  3. 2019Rethinking Learning-based Demosaicing, Denoising, and Super-Resolution Pipelinecited by 13
  4. 2018Learning Deep Convolutional Networks for Demosaicingcited by 10
  5. 2022Residual Swin Transformer Channel Attention Network for Image Demosaicingcited by 6
  6. 2018Low Cost Edge Sensing for High Quality Demosaickingcited by 3
  7. 2019Deep Demosaicing for Edge Implementationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.