mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

UFO: A unified method for controlling Understandability and Faithfulness Objectives in concept-based explanations for CNNs

arXiv 2303.15632 ↗First posted 27 Mar 2023cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Concept-based explanations for convolutional neural networks (CNNs) aim to explain model behavior and outputs using a pre-defined set of semantic concepts (e.g., the model recognizes scene class ``bedroom'' based on the presence of concepts ``bed'' and ``pillow''). However, they often do not faithfully (i.e., accurately) characterize the model's behavior and can be too complex for people to understand. Further, little is known about how faithful and understandable different explanation methods are, and how to control these two properties. In this work, we propose UFO, a unified method for controlling Understandability and Faithfulness Objectives in concept-based explanations. UFO formalizes understandability and faithfulness as mathematical objectives and unifies most existing concept-based explanations methods for CNNs. Using UFO, we systematically investigate how explanations change as we turn the knobs of faithfulness and understandability. Our experiments demonstrate a faithfulness-vs-understandability tradeoff: increasing understandability reduces faithfulness. We also provide insights into the ``disagreement problem'' in explainable machine learning, by analyzing when and how concept-based explanations disagree with each other.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2023.

Builds on

27 of 33 references.

References · 27

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  4. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  5. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  6. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  7. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  8. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
  9. 2016Semantic Understanding of Scenes through the ADE20K Datasetcited by 1,063
  10. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
  11. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
  12. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
15 more
  1. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
  2. 2016Top-down Neural Attention by Excitation Backpropcited by 318
  3. 2019Understanding Deep Networks via Extremal Perturbations and Smooth Maskscited by 257
  4. 2022The Disagreement Problem in Explainable Machine Learning: A Practitioner's Perspectivecited by 156
  5. 2020Debugging Tests for Model Explanationscited by 146
  6. 2018Net2Vec: Quantifying and Explaining how Concepts are Encoded by Filters in Deep Neural Networkscited by 128
  7. 2021HIVE: Evaluating the Human Interpretability of Visual Explanationscited by 105
  8. 2019Explainability Fact Sheets: A Framework for Systematic Assessment of Explainable Approachescited by 101
  9. 2022Which Explanation Should I Choose? A Function Approximation Perspective to Characterizing Post Hoc Explanationscited by 77
  10. 2022"Help Me Help the AI": Understanding How Explainability Can Support Human-AI Interactioncited by 63
  11. 2022Post hoc Explanations may be Ineffective for Detecting Unknown Spurious Correlationcited by 59
  12. 2022Neural Basis Models for Interpretabilitycited by 56
  13. 2022Scalable Interpretability via Polynomialscited by 25
  14. 2020Contextual Semantic Interpretabilitycited by 14
  15. 2022ELUDE: Generating interpretable explanations via a decomposition into labelled and unlabelled featurescited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.