mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

"That's important, but...": How Computer Science Researchers Anticipate Unintended Consequences of Their Research Innovations

arXiv 2303.15536 ↗First posted 27 Mar 2023cs.HC cs.CYcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Computer science research has led to many breakthrough innovations but has also been scrutinized for enabling technology that has negative, unintended consequences for society. Given the increasing discussions of ethics in the news and among researchers, we interviewed 20 researchers in various CS sub-disciplines to identify whether and how they consider potential unintended consequences of their research innovations. We show that considering unintended consequences is generally seen as important but rarely practiced. Principal barriers are a lack of formal process and strategy as well as the academic practice that prioritizes fast progress and publications. Drawing on these findings, we discuss approaches to support researchers in routinely considering unintended consequences, from bringing diverse perspectives through community participation to increasing incentives to investigate potential consequences. We intend for our work to pave the way for routine explorations of the societal implications of technological innovations before, during, and after the research process.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2023.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

8 papers.