On the Connection between Lp and Risk Consistency and its Implications on Regularized Kernel Methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As a predictor's quality is often assessed by means of its risk, it is natural to regard risk consistency as a desirable property of learning methods, and many such methods have indeed been shown to be risk consistent. The first aim of this paper is to establish the close connection between risk consistency and Lp-consistency for a considerably wider class of loss functions than has been done before. The attempt to transfer this connection to shifted loss functions surprisingly reveals that this shift does not reduce the assumptions needed on the underlying probability measure to the same extent as it does for many other results. The results are applied to regularized kernel methods such as support vector machines.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2023.
Builds on
5 of 47 references.
References · 5
- 2017Sobolev Norm Learning Rates for Regularized Least-Squares Algorithmcited by 113
- 2021Universal Consistency of Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 16
- 2017Learning Rates for Kernel-Based Expectile Regressioncited by 4
- 2021Total Stability of SVMs and Localized SVMscited by 4
- 2022Dimensionality Reduction and Wasserstein Stability for Kernel Regressioncited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.
- 2023Lp- and Risk Consistency of Localized SVMscited by 0
- 2023Lp- and Risk Consistency of Localized SVMs16 May 2023