mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On CNF Conversion for SAT and SMT Enumeration

arXiv 2303.14971 ↗First posted 27 Mar 2023cs.LOcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern SAT and SMT solvers are designed to handle problems expressed in Conjunctive Normal Form (CNF) so that non-CNF problems must be CNF-ized upfront, typically by using variants of either Tseitin or Plaisted and Greenbaum transformations. When passing from plain solving to enumeration, however, the capability of producing partial satisfying assignments that are as small as possible becomes crucial, which raises the question of whether such CNF encodings are also effective for enumeration. In this paper, we investigate both theoretically and empirically the effectiveness of CNF conversions for SAT and SMT enumeration. On the negative side, we show that: (i) Tseitin transformation prevents the solver from producing short partial assignments, thus seriously affecting the effectiveness of enumeration; (ii) Plaisted and Greenbaum transformation overcomes this problem only in part. On the positive side, we prove theoretically and we show empirically that combining Plaisted and Greenbaum transformation with NNF preprocessing upfront -- which is typically not used in solving -- can fully overcome the problem and can drastically reduce both the number of partial assignments and the execution time.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2023.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.