Feature Tracks are not Zero-Mean Gaussian
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In state estimation algorithms that use feature tracks as input, it is customary to assume that the errors in feature track positions are zero-mean Gaussian. Using a combination of calibrated camera intrinsics, ground-truth camera pose, and depth images, it is possible to compute ground-truth positions for feature tracks extracted using an image processing algorithm. We find that feature track errors are not zero-mean Gaussian and that the distribution of errors is conditional on the type of motion, the speed of motion, and the image processing algorithm used to extract the tracks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2023.
Builds on
5 of 36 references.
References · 5
- 2015ORB-SLAM: a Versatile and Accurate Monocular SLAM Systemcited by 988
- 2020TartanAir: A Dataset to Push the Limits of Visual SLAMcited by 506
- 2017Sparsity Invariant CNNscited by 326
- 2017HPatches: A benchmark and evaluation of handcrafted and learned local descriptorscited by 264
- 2022Hilti-Oxford Dataset: A Millimetre-Accurate Benchmark for Simultaneous Localization and Mappingcited by 23
Built on by
Not cited yet.