mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Removing confounding information from fetal ultrasound images

arXiv 2303.13918 ↗First posted 24 Mar 2023cs.CV cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Confounding information in the form of text or markings embedded in medical images can severely affect the training of diagnostic deep learning algorithms. However, data collected for clinical purposes often have such markings embedded in them. In dermatology, known examples include drawings or rulers that are overrepresented in images of malignant lesions. In this paper, we encounter text and calipers placed on the images found in national databases containing fetal screening ultrasound scans, which correlate with standard planes to be predicted. In order to utilize the vast amounts of data available in these databases, we develop and validate a series of methods for minimizing the confounding effects of embedded text and calipers on deep learning algorithms designed for ultrasound, using standard plane classification as a test case.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2023.

Builds on

6 of 12 references.

References · 6

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  3. 2019Interpretations are useful: penalizing explanations to align neural networks with prior knowledgecited by 144
  4. 2021IAIA-BL: A Case-based Interpretable Deep Learning Model for Classification of Mass Lesions in Digital Mammographycited by 72
  5. 2020Scene text removal via cascaded text stroke detection and erasingcited by 18
  6. 2021Skin Deep Unlearning: Artefact and Instrument Debiasing in the Context of Melanoma Classificationcited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

3 papers.