Mining Clinical Notes for Physical Rehabilitation Exercise Information: Natural Language Processing Algorithm Development and Validation Study
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Post-stroke patient rehabilitation requires precise, personalized treatment plans. Natural Language Processing (NLP) offers potential to extract valuable exercise information from clinical notes, aiding in the development of more effective rehabilitation strategies. Objective: This study aims to develop and evaluate a variety of NLP algorithms to extract and categorize physical rehabilitation exercise information from the clinical notes of post-stroke patients treated at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. A cohort of 13,605 patients diagnosed with stroke was identified, and their clinical notes containing rehabilitation therapy notes were retrieved. A comprehensive clinical ontology was created to represent various aspects of physical rehabilitation exercises. State-of-the-art NLP algorithms were then developed and compared, including rule-based, machine learning-based algorithms, and large language model (LLM)-based algorithms (ChatGPT). Analysis was conducted on a dataset comprising 23,724 notes with detailed demographic and clinical characteristics. The rule-based NLP algorithm demonstrated superior performance in most areas, particularly in detecting the 'Right Side' location with an F1 score of 0.975, outperforming Gradient Boosting by 0.063. Gradient Boosting excelled in 'Lower Extremity' location detection (F1 score: 0.978), surpassing rule-based NLP by 0.023. It also showed notable performance in 'Passive Range of Motion' with an F1 score of 0.970, a 0.032 improvement over rule-based NLP. The rule-based algorithm efficiently handled 'Duration', 'Sets', and 'Reps' with F1 scores up to 0.65. LLM-based NLP, particularly ChatGPT with few-shot prompts, achieved high recall but generally lower precision and F1 scores. However, it notably excelled in 'Backward Plane' motion detection, achieving an F1 score of 0.846, surpassing the rule-based algorithm's 0.720.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2023.
Builds on
3 of 25 references.
References · 3
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,856
- 2019Publicly Available Clinical BERT Embeddingscited by 999
- 2022HealthPrompt: A Zero-shot Learning Paradigm for Clinical Natural Language Processingcited by 26
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2.
3 papers.
- 2024A Survey on Large Language Models from General Purpose to Medical Applications: Datasets, Methodologies, and Evaluationscited by 16
- 2024Large Language Models versus Classical Machine Learning: Performance in COVID-19 Mortality Prediction Using High-Dimensional Tabular Datacited by 3
- 2023ReDWINE: A Clinical Datamart with Text Analytical Capabilities to Facilitate Rehabilitation Researchcited by 0
- 2024Large Language Models versus Classical Machine Learning: Performance in COVID-19 Mortality Prediction Using High-Dimensional Tabular Data2 Sep 2024
- 2024A Survey on Large Language Models from General Purpose to Medical Applications: Datasets, Methodologies, and Evaluations14 Jun 2024
- 2023ReDWINE: A Clinical Datamart with Text Analytical Capabilities to Facilitate Rehabilitation Research12 Apr 2023