Deep Attention Recognition for Attack Identification in 5G UAV scenarios: Novel Architecture and End-to-End Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite the robust security features inherent in the 5G framework, attackers will still discover ways to disrupt 5G unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) operations and decrease UAV control communication performance in Air-to-Ground (A2G) links. Operating under the assumption that the 5G UAV communications infrastructure will never be entirely secure, we propose Deep Attention Recognition (DAtR) as a solution to identify attacks based on a small deep network embedded in authenticated UAVs. Our proposed solution uses two observable parameters: the Signal-to-Interference-plus-Noise Ratio (SINR) and the Reference Signal Received Power (RSSI) to recognize attacks under Line-of-Sight (LoS), Non-Line-of-Sight (NLoS), and a probabilistic combination of the two conditions. In the tested scenarios, a number of attackers are located in random positions, while their power is varied in each simulation. Moreover, terrestrial users are included in the network to impose additional complexity on attack detection. To improve the systems overall performance in the attack scenarios, we propose complementing the deep network decision with two mechanisms based on data manipulation and majority voting techniques. We compare several performance parameters in our proposed Deep Network. For example, the impact of Long Short-Term-Memory (LSTM) and Attention layers in terms of their overall accuracy, the window size effect, and test the accuracy when only partial data is available in the training process. Finally, we benchmark our deep network with six widely used classifiers regarding classification accuracy. Our algorithms accuracy exceeds 4% compared with the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) classifier in LoS condition and around 3% in the short distance NLoS condition. Considering the proposed deep network, all other classifiers present lower accuracy than XGB.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2023.
Builds on
13 of 44 references.
References · 13
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018Deep learning for time series classification: a reviewcited by 575
- 2018Bag of Tricks for Image Classification with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 430
- 2017Learning to Optimize: Training Deep Neural Networks for Wireless Resource Managementcited by 96
- 2019UAV Communications for 5G and Beyond: Recent Advances and Future Trendscited by 24
- 2021What Will the Future of UAV Cellular Communications Be? A Flight from 5G to 6Gcited by 11
- 2020Multi-stage Jamming Attacks Detection using Deep Learning Combined with Kernelized Support Vector Machine in 5G Cloud Radio Access Networkscited by 8
- 2020A Novel Jamming Attacks Detection Approach Based on Machine Learning for Wireless Communicationcited by 6
- 2018Cellular Connectivity for UAVs: Network Modeling, Performance Analysis and Design Guidelinescited by 5
- 2021Cellular, Wide-Area, and Non-Terrestrial IoT: A Survey on 5G Advances and the Road Towards 6Gcited by 5
- 2021Detection and blind channel estimation for UAV-aided wireless sensor networks in smart cities under mobile jamming attackcited by 2
- 2022A Synthetic Dataset for 5G UAV Attacks Based on Observable Network Parameterscited by 2
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
3 papers.