Wasserstein Adversarial Examples on Univariant Time Series Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial examples are crafted by adding indistinguishable perturbations to normal examples in order to fool a well-trained deep learning model to misclassify. In the context of computer vision, this notion of indistinguishability is typically bounded by L∞ or other norms. However, these norms are not appropriate for measuring indistinguishiability for time series data. In this work, we propose adversarial examples in the Wasserstein space for time series data for the first time and utilize Wasserstein distance to bound the perturbation between normal examples and adversarial examples. We introduce Wasserstein projected gradient descent (WPGD), an adversarial attack method for perturbing univariant time series data. We leverage the closed-form solution of Wasserstein distance in the 1D space to calculate the projection step of WPGD efficiently with the gradient descent method. We further propose a two-step projection so that the search of adversarial examples in the Wasserstein space is guided and constrained by Euclidean norms to yield more effective and imperceptible perturbations. We empirically evaluate the proposed attack on several time series datasets in the healthcare domain. Extensive results demonstrate that the Wasserstein attack is powerful and can successfully attack most of the target classifiers with a high attack success rate. To better study the nature of Wasserstein adversarial example, we evaluate a strong defense mechanism named Wasserstein smoothing for potential certified robustness defense. Although the defense can achieve some accuracy gain, it still has limitations in many cases and leaves space for developing a stronger certified robustness method to Wasserstein adversarial examples on univariant time series data.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2023.
Builds on
17 of 30 references.
References · 17
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
- 2018Deep learning for time series classification: a reviewcited by 575
- 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 462
- 2018Multivariate LSTM-FCNs for Time Series Classificationcited by 120
- 2019Wasserstein Adversarial Examples via Projected Sinkhorn Iterationscited by 89
5 more
- 2017Adversarial Transformation Networks: Learning to Generate Adversarial Examplescited by 60
- 2019Adversarial Attacks on Deep Neural Networks for Time Series Classificationcited by 53
- 2019Adversarial Attacks on Time Seriescited by 40
- 2020Adversarial Examples in Deep Learning for Multivariate Time Series Regressioncited by 26
- 2019Wasserstein Smoothing: Certified Robustness against Wasserstein Adversarial Attackscited by 25
Built on by
Not cited yet.