Deceptive Reinforcement Learning in Model-Free Domains
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper investigates deceptive reinforcement learning for privacy preservation in model-free and continuous action space domains. In reinforcement learning, the reward function defines the agent's objective. In adversarial scenarios, an agent may need to both maximise rewards and keep its reward function private from observers. Recent research presented the ambiguity model (AM), which selects actions that are ambiguous over a set of possible reward functions, via pre-trained Q-functions. Despite promising results in model-based domains, our investigation shows that AM is ineffective in model-free domains due to misdirected state space exploration. It is also inefficient to train and inapplicable in continuous action space domains. We propose the deceptive exploration ambiguity model (DEAM), which learns using the deceptive policy during training, leading to targeted exploration of the state space. DEAM is also applicable in continuous action spaces. We evaluate DEAM in discrete and continuous action space path planning environments. DEAM achieves similar performance to an optimal model-based version of AM and outperforms a model-free version of AM in terms of path cost, deceptiveness and training efficiency. These results extend to the continuous domain.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2023.
Builds on
5 of 29 references.
References · 5
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2021Deceptive Reinforcement Learning for Privacy-Preserving Planningcited by 14
- 2017Benchmark Environments for Multitask Learning in Continuous Domainscited by 13
- 2018Deception in Optimal Controlcited by 10
- 2021Deceptive Decision-Making Under Uncertaintycited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2023Covert Planning against Imperfect Observerscited by 1
- 2024Deceptive Path Planning via Reinforcement Learning with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1
- 2024On the Transit Obfuscation Problemcited by 1
- 2024Preserving the Privacy of Reward Functions in MDPs through Deceptioncited by 1
- 2025Deceptive Exploration in Multi-armed Banditscited by 1
- 2025Value of Information-based Deceptive Path Planning Under Adversarial Interventionscited by 0
- 2026Repeated Deceptive Path Planning against Learnable Observercited by 0
- 2026Repeated Deceptive Path Planning against Learnable Observer8 May 2026
- 2025Deceptive Exploration in Multi-armed Bandits9 Oct 2025
- 2025Value of Information-based Deceptive Path Planning Under Adversarial Interventions31 Mar 2025
- 2024Preserving the Privacy of Reward Functions in MDPs through Deception13 Jul 2024
- 2024On the Transit Obfuscation Problem12 Feb 2024
- 2024Deceptive Path Planning via Reinforcement Learning with Graph Neural Networks9 Feb 2024
- 2023Covert Planning against Imperfect Observers25 Oct 2023