mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deceptive Reinforcement Learning in Model-Free Domains

arXiv 2303.10838 ↗First posted 20 Mar 2023cs.AI cs.MAcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper investigates deceptive reinforcement learning for privacy preservation in model-free and continuous action space domains. In reinforcement learning, the reward function defines the agent's objective. In adversarial scenarios, an agent may need to both maximise rewards and keep its reward function private from observers. Recent research presented the ambiguity model (AM), which selects actions that are ambiguous over a set of possible reward functions, via pre-trained Q-functions. Despite promising results in model-based domains, our investigation shows that AM is ineffective in model-free domains due to misdirected state space exploration. It is also inefficient to train and inapplicable in continuous action space domains. We propose the deceptive exploration ambiguity model (DEAM), which learns using the deceptive policy during training, leading to targeted exploration of the state space. DEAM is also applicable in continuous action spaces. We evaluate DEAM in discrete and continuous action space path planning environments. DEAM achieves similar performance to an optimal model-based version of AM and outperforms a model-free version of AM in terms of path cost, deceptiveness and training efficiency. These results extend to the continuous domain.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2023.

Builds on

5 of 29 references.

References · 5

  1. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  2. 2021Deceptive Reinforcement Learning for Privacy-Preserving Planningcited by 14
  3. 2017Benchmark Environments for Multitask Learning in Continuous Domainscited by 13
  4. 2018Deception in Optimal Controlcited by 10
  5. 2021Deceptive Decision-Making Under Uncertaintycited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

7 papers.