mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Two Kinds of Recall

arXiv 2303.10527 ↗First posted 19 Mar 2023cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It is an established assumption that pattern-based models are good at precision, while learning based models are better at recall. But is that really the case? I argue that there are two kinds of recall: d-recall, reflecting diversity, and e-recall, reflecting exhaustiveness. I demonstrate through experiments that while neural methods are indeed significantly better at d-recall, it is sometimes the case that pattern-based methods are still substantially better at e-recall. Ideal methods should aim for both kinds, and this ideal should in turn be reflected in our evaluations.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2023.

Builds on

8 of 11 references.

References · 8

  1. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  2. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  3. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,554
  4. 2016Deep Biaffine Attention for Neural Dependency Parsingcited by 334
  5. 2016Simple and Accurate Dependency Parsing Using Bidirectional LSTM Feature Representationscited by 55
  6. 2020Syntactic Search by Examplecited by 20
  7. 2020Interactive Extractive Search over Biomedical Corporacited by 10
  8. 2020pyBART: Evidence-based Syntactic Transformations for IEcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.