Characterizing and Predicting Social Correction on Twitter
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Online misinformation has been a serious threat to public health and society. Social media users are known to reply to misinformation posts with counter-misinformation messages, which have been shown to be effective in curbing the spread of misinformation. This is called social correction. However, the characteristics of tweets that attract social correction versus those that do not remain unknown. To close the gap, we focus on answering the following two research questions: (1) ``Given a tweet, will it be countered by other users?'', and (2) ``If yes, what will be the magnitude of countering it?''. This exploration will help develop mechanisms to guide users' misinformation correction efforts and to measure disparity across users who get corrected. In this work, we first create a novel dataset with 690,047 pairs of misinformation tweets and counter-misinformation replies. Then, stratified analysis of tweet linguistic and engagement features as well as tweet posters' user attributes are conducted to illustrate the factors that are significant in determining whether a tweet will get countered. Finally, predictive classifiers are created to predict the likelihood of a misinformation tweet to get countered and the degree to which that tweet will be countered. The code and data is accessible on https://github.com/claws-lab/social-correction-twitter.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2024NLP for Counterspeech against Hate: A Survey and How-To Guidecited by 22
- 2023Countering Misinformation via Emotional Response Generationcited by 9
- 2025Limited Effectiveness of LLM-based Data Augmentation for COVID-19 Misinformation Stance Detectioncited by 7
- 2024Towards Fair Graph Anomaly Detection: Problem, Benchmark Datasets, and Evaluationcited by 6
- 2024Hierarchical Query Classification in E-commerce Searchcited by 2
- 2025SPOT: An Annotated French Corpus and Benchmark for Detecting Critical Interventions in Online Conversationscited by 0
- 2026Angry but Accurate: Detecting and Profiling the Counter-Misinformation Ecosystem on Twittercited by 0
- 2026Angry but Accurate: Detecting and Profiling the Counter-Misinformation Ecosystem on Twitter3 Jul 2026
- 2025SPOT: An Annotated French Corpus and Benchmark for Detecting Critical Interventions in Online Conversations10 Nov 2025
- 2025Limited Effectiveness of LLM-based Data Augmentation for COVID-19 Misinformation Stance Detection4 Mar 2025
- 2024NLP for Counterspeech against Hate: A Survey and How-To Guide29 Mar 2024
- 2024Hierarchical Query Classification in E-commerce Search9 Mar 2024
- 2024Towards Fair Graph Anomaly Detection: Problem, Benchmark Datasets, and Evaluation25 Feb 2024
- 2023Countering Misinformation via Emotional Response Generation17 Nov 2023