Thinking Upstream: Ethics and Policy Opportunities in AI Supply Chains
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
After children were pictured sewing its running shoes in the early 1990s, Nike at first disavowed the "working conditions in its suppliers' factories", before public pressure led them to take responsibility for ethics in their upstream supply chain. In 2023, OpenAI responded to criticism that Kenyan workers were paid less than 2 per hour to filter traumatic content from its ChatGPT model by stating in part that it had outsourced the work to a subcontractor, who managed workers' payment and mental health concerns. In this position paper, we argue that policy interventions for AI Ethics must consider AI as a supply chain problem, given how the political economy and intra-firm relations structure AI production, in particular examining opportunities upstream.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
2 papers.
- 2025The 2025 Foundation Model Transparency Indexcited by 9
- 2023The Ethics of AI Value Chainscited by 3
- 2025The 2025 Foundation Model Transparency Index11 Dec 2025
- 2023The Ethics of AI Value Chains31 Jul 2023