Bias, diversity, and challenges to fairness in classification and automated text analysis. From libraries to AI and back
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Libraries are increasingly relying on computational methods, including methods from Artificial Intelligence (AI). This increasing usage raises concerns about the risks of AI that are currently broadly discussed in scientific literature, the media and law-making. In this article we investigate the risks surrounding bias and unfairness in AI usage in classification and automated text analysis within the context of library applications. We describe examples that show how the library community has been aware of such risks for a long time, and how it has developed and deployed countermeasures. We take a closer look at the notion of '(un)fairness' in relation to the notion of 'diversity', and we investigate a formalisation of diversity that models both inclusion and distribution. We argue that many of the unfairness problems of automated content analysis can also be regarded through the lens of diversity and the countermeasures taken to enhance diversity.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2023.
Builds on
4 of 27 references.
References · 4
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
- 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 956
- 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 901
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.