Can spoofing countermeasure and speaker verification systems be jointly optimised?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Spoofing countermeasure (CM) and automatic speaker verification (ASV) sub-systems can be used in tandem with a backend classifier as a solution to the spoofing aware speaker verification (SASV) task. The two sub-systems are typically trained independently to solve different tasks. While our previous work demonstrated the potential of joint optimisation, it also showed a tendency to over-fit to speakers and a lack of sub-system complementarity. Using only a modest quantity of auxiliary data collected from new speakers, we show that joint optimisation degrades the performance of separate CM and ASV sub-systems, but that it nonetheless improves complementarity, thereby delivering superior SASV performance. Using standard SASV evaluation data and protocols, joint optimisation reduces the equal error rate by 27% relative to performance obtained using fixed, independently-optimised sub-systems under like-for-like training conditions.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.