mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Symbolic Regression for PDEs using Pruned Differentiable Programs

arXiv 2303.07009 ↗First posted 13 Mar 2023cs.LG cs.AI math.APcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Physics-informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have been widely used to obtain accurate neural surrogates for a system of Partial Differential Equations (PDE). One of the major limitations of PINNs is that the neural solutions are challenging to interpret, and are often treated as black-box solvers. While Symbolic Regression (SR) has been studied extensively, very few works exist which generate analytical expressions to directly perform SR for a system of PDEs. In this work, we introduce an end-to-end framework for obtaining mathematical expressions for solutions of PDEs. We use a trained PINN to generate a dataset, upon which we perform SR. We use a Differentiable Program Architecture (DPA) defined using context-free grammar to describe the space of symbolic expressions. We improve the interpretability by pruning the DPA in a depth-first manner using the magnitude of weights as our heuristic. On average, we observe a 95.3% reduction in parameters of DPA while maintaining accuracy at par with PINNs. Furthermore, on an average, pruning improves the accuracy of DPA by 7.81% . We demonstrate our framework outperforms the existing state-of-the-art SR solvers on systems of complex PDEs like Navier-Stokes: Kovasznay flow and Taylor-Green Vortex flow. Furthermore, we produce analytical expressions for a complex industrial use-case of an Air-Preheater, without suffering from performance loss viz-a-viz PINNs.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2023.

Builds on

15 of 29 references.

References · 15

  1. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 536
  2. 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 294
  3. 2019Deep Learning for Symbolic Mathematicscited by 266
  4. 2020AI Feynman 2.0: Pareto-optimal symbolic regression exploiting graph modularitycited by 140
  5. 2017RobustFill: Neural Program Learning under Noisy I/Ocited by 124
  6. 2021SymbolicGPT: A Generative Transformer Model for Symbolic Regressioncited by 101
  7. 2022Symbolic Regression is NP-hardcited by 68
  8. 2022Error estimates for physics informed neural networks approximating the Navier-Stokes equationscited by 63
  9. 2018Neural Program Synthesis with Priority Queue Trainingcited by 24
  10. 2022Deep Learning and Symbolic Regression for Discovering Parametric Equationscited by 22
  11. 2022Taylor Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regressioncited by 18
  12. 2019Data-driven PDE discovery with evolutionary approachcited by 7
3 more
  1. 2019Neural-Guided Symbolic Regression with Asymptotic Constraintscited by 5
  2. 2020Symbolically Solving Partial Differential Equations using Deep Learningcited by 3
  3. 2022Real-time Health Monitoring of Heat Exchangers using Hypernetworks and PINNscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

6 papers.