A Test Statistic Estimation-based Approach for Establishing Self-interpretable CNN-based Binary Classifiers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Interpretability is highly desired for deep neural network-based classifiers, especially when addressing high-stake decisions in medical imaging. Commonly used post-hoc interpretability methods have the limitation that they can produce plausible but different interpretations of a given model, leading to ambiguity about which one to choose. To address this problem, a novel decision-theory-inspired approach is investigated to establish a self-interpretable model, given a pre-trained deep binary black-box medical image classifier. This approach involves utilizing a self-interpretable encoder-decoder model in conjunction with a single-layer fully connected network with unity weights. The model is trained to estimate the test statistic of the given trained black-box deep binary classifier to maintain a similar accuracy. The decoder output image, referred to as an equivalency map, is an image that represents a transformed version of the to-be-classified image that, when processed by the fixed fully connected layer, produces the same test statistic value as the original classifier. The equivalency map provides a visualization of the transformed image features that directly contribute to the test statistic value and, moreover, permits quantification of their relative contributions. Unlike the traditional post-hoc interpretability methods, the proposed method is self-interpretable, quantitative. Detailed quantitative and qualitative analyses have been performed with three different medical image binary classification tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2023.
Builds on
19 of 29 references.
References · 19
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
- 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
- 2017ChestX-ray8: Hospital-scale Chest X-ray Database and Benchmarks on Weakly-Supervised Classification and Localization of Common Thorax Diseasescited by 969
- 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 731
- 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
- 2020Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Netscited by 318
7 more
- 2020A Survey on Neural Network Interpretabilitycited by 291
- 2018Techniques for Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 237
- 2017Deep Learning for Case-Based Reasoning through Prototypes: A Neural Network that Explains Its Predictionscited by 234
- 2016Layer-wise Relevance Propagation for Neural Networks with Local Renormalization Layerscited by 197
- 2020Learning to Faithfully Rationalize by Constructioncited by 113
- 2020Explainable deep learning models in medical image analysiscited by 111
- 2021Self-Interpretable Model with TransformationEquivariant Interpretationcited by 21
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.