Deep Spiking Neural Networks with High Representation Similarity Model Visual Pathways of Macaque and Mouse
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep artificial neural networks (ANNs) play a major role in modeling the visual pathways of primate and rodent. However, they highly simplify the computational properties of neurons compared to their biological counterparts. Instead, Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) are more biologically plausible models since spiking neurons encode information with time sequences of spikes, just like biological neurons do. However, there is a lack of studies on visual pathways with deep SNNs models. In this study, we model the visual cortex with deep SNNs for the first time, and also with a wide range of state-of-the-art deep CNNs and ViTs for comparison. Using three similarity metrics, we conduct neural representation similarity experiments on three neural datasets collected from two species under three types of stimuli. Based on extensive similarity analyses, we further investigate the functional hierarchy and mechanisms across species. Almost all similarity scores of SNNs are higher than their counterparts of CNNs with an average of 6.6%. Depths of the layers with the highest similarity scores exhibit little differences across mouse cortical regions, but vary significantly across macaque regions, suggesting that the visual processing structure of mice is more regionally homogeneous than that of macaques. Besides, the multi-branch structures observed in some top mouse brain-like neural networks provide computational evidence of parallel processing streams in mice, and the different performance in fitting macaque neural representations under different stimuli exhibits the functional specialization of information processing in macaques. Taken together, our study demonstrates that SNNs could serve as promising candidates to better model and explain the functional hierarchy and mechanisms of the visual system.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 3.
6 papers.
- 2023SpikingJelly: An open-source machine learning infrastructure platform for spike-based intelligencecited by 163
- 2024Spiking Tucker Fusion Transformer for Audio-Visual Zero-Shot Learningcited by 10
- 2025Improving Unsupervised Task-driven Models of Ventral Visual Stream via Relative Position Predictivitycited by 1
- 2024Toward Efficient Deep Spiking Neuron Networks:A Survey On Compressioncited by 0
- 2025TDSNNs: Competitive Topographic Deep Spiking Neural Networks for Visual Cortex Modelingcited by 0
- 2025Manifolds and Modules: How Function Develops in a Neural Foundation Modelcited by 0
- 2025Manifolds and Modules: How Function Develops in a Neural Foundation Model26 Nov 2025
- 2025TDSNNs: Competitive Topographic Deep Spiking Neural Networks for Visual Cortex Modeling6 Aug 2025
- 2025Improving Unsupervised Task-driven Models of Ventral Visual Stream via Relative Position Predictivity13 May 2025
- 2024Spiking Tucker Fusion Transformer for Audio-Visual Zero-Shot Learning11 Jul 2024
- 2024Toward Efficient Deep Spiking Neuron Networks:A Survey On Compression3 Jun 2024
- 2023SpikingJelly: An open-source machine learning infrastructure platform for spike-based intelligence25 Oct 2023