mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Scaling Up 3D Kernels with Bayesian Frequency Re-parameterization for Medical Image Segmentation

arXiv 2303.05785 ↗First posted 10 Mar 2023eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the inspiration of vision transformers, the concept of depth-wise convolution revisits to provide a large Effective Receptive Field (ERF) using Large Kernel (LK) sizes for medical image segmentation. However, the segmentation performance might be saturated and even degraded as the kernel sizes scaled up (e.g., 21× 21× 21) in a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). We hypothesize that convolution with LK sizes is limited to maintain an optimal convergence for locality learning. While Structural Re-parameterization (SR) enhances the local convergence with small kernels in parallel, optimal small kernel branches may hinder the computational efficiency for training. In this work, we propose RepUX-Net, a pure CNN architecture with a simple large kernel block design, which competes favorably with current network state-of-the-art (SOTA) (e.g., 3D UX-Net, SwinUNETR) using 6 challenging public datasets. We derive an equivalency between kernel re-parameterization and the branch-wise variation in kernel convergence. Inspired by the spatial frequency in the human visual system, we extend to vary the kernel convergence into element-wise setting and model the spatial frequency as a Bayesian prior to re-parameterize convolutional weights during training. Specifically, a reciprocal function is leveraged to estimate a frequency-weighted value, which rescales the corresponding kernel element for stochastic gradient descent. From the experimental results, RepUX-Net consistently outperforms 3D SOTA benchmarks with internal validation (FLARE: 0.929 to 0.944), external validation (MSD: 0.901 to 0.932, KiTS: 0.815 to 0.847, LiTS: 0.933 to 0.949, TCIA: 0.736 to 0.779) and transfer learning (AMOS: 0.880 to 0.911) scenarios in Dice Score.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2023.

Builds on

19 of 25 references.

References · 19

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  3. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
  4. 2021UNETR: Transformers for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 959
  5. 2022Swin UNETR: Swin Transformers for Semantic Segmentation of Brain Tumors in MRI Imagescited by 830
  6. 2021The Medical Segmentation Decathloncited by 628
  7. 2021RepVGG: Making VGG-style ConvNets Great Againcited by 522
  8. 2019The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)cited by 509
  9. 2021Self-Supervised Pre-Training of Swin Transformers for 3D Medical Image Analysiscited by 422
  10. 2022AMOS: A Large-Scale Abdominal Multi-Organ Benchmark for Versatile Medical Image Segmentationcited by 351
  11. 2021TransBTS: Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Transformercited by 265
  12. 2020AbdomenCT-1K: Is Abdominal Organ Segmentation A Solved Problem?cited by 224
7 more
  1. 2015DeepOrgan: Multi-level Deep Convolutional Networks for Automated Pancreas Segmentationcited by 159
  2. 2022Scaling Up Your Kernels to 31x31: Revisiting Large Kernel Design in CNNscited by 155
  3. 2022More ConvNets in the 2020s: Scaling up Kernels Beyond 51x51 using Sparsitycited by 142
  4. 20223D UX-Net: A Large Kernel Volumetric ConvNet Modernizing Hierarchical Transformer for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 94
  5. 2022Re-parameterizing Your Optimizers rather than Architecturescited by 35
  6. 2022Large-Kernel Attention for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 7
  7. 2022Online Convolutional Re-parameterizationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 6; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

12 papers.