Can a Frozen Pretrained Language Model be used for Zero-shot Neural Retrieval on Entity-centric Questions?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural document retrievers, including dense passage retrieval (DPR), have outperformed classical lexical-matching retrievers, such as BM25, when fine-tuned and tested on specific question-answering datasets. However, it has been shown that the existing dense retrievers do not generalize well not only out of domain but even in domain such as Wikipedia, especially when a named entity in a question is a dominant clue for retrieval. In this paper, we propose an approach toward in-domain generalization using the embeddings generated by the frozen language model trained with the entities in the domain. By not fine-tuning, we explore the possibility that the rich knowledge contained in a pretrained language model can be used for retrieval tasks. The proposed method outperforms conventional DPRs on entity-centric questions in Wikipedia domain and achieves almost comparable performance to BM25 and state-of-the-art SPAR model. We also show that the contextualized keys lead to strong improvements compared to BM25 when the entity names consist of common words. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of the zero-shot retrieval method for entity-centric questions of Wikipedia domain, where DPR has struggled to perform.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2023.
Builds on
22 of 38 references.
References · 22
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 2021BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Modelscited by 1,225
- 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 846
- 2017Reading Wikipedia to Answer Open-Domain Questionscited by 777
- 2019Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 691
- 2019CCNet: Extracting High Quality Monolingual Datasets from Web Crawl Datacited by 544
- 2020LUKE: Deep Contextualized Entity Representations with Entity-aware Self-attentioncited by 326
- 2020Sparse, Dense, and Attentional Representations for Text Retrievalcited by 213
- 2021PAQ: 65 Million Probably-Asked Questions and What You Can Do With Themcited by 198
10 more
- 2020Recall and Learn: Fine-tuning Deep Pretrained Language Models with Less Forgettingcited by 169
- 2022Improving Passage Retrieval with Zero-Shot Question Generationcited by 164
- 2021Simple Entity-Centric Questions Challenge Dense Retrieverscited by 140
- 2021COIL: Revisit Exact Lexical Match in Information Retrieval with Contextualized Inverted Listcited by 113
- 2020Relevance-guided Supervision for OpenQA with ColBERTcited by 71
- 2021Salient Phrase Aware Dense Retrieval: Can a Dense Retriever Imitate a Sparse One?cited by 59
- 2020SPARTA: Efficient Open-Domain Question Answering via Sparse Transformer Matching Retrievalcited by 50
- 2021A Closer Look at How Fine-tuning Changes BERTcited by 42
- 2021A Replication Study of Dense Passage Retrievercited by 37
- 2021Match Your Words! A Study of Lexical Matching in Neural Information Retrievalcited by 10
Built on by
Not cited yet.