mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Deep Hypothesis Tests Detect Clinically Relevant Subgroup Shifts in Medical Images

arXiv 2303.04862 ↗First posted 8 Mar 2023cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Distribution shifts remain a fundamental problem for the safe application of machine learning systems. If undetected, they may impact the real-world performance of such systems or will at least render original performance claims invalid. In this paper, we focus on the detection of subgroup shifts, a type of distribution shift that can occur when subgroups have a different prevalence during validation compared to the deployment setting. For example, algorithms developed on data from various acquisition settings may be predominantly applied in hospitals with lower quality data acquisition, leading to an inadvertent performance drop. We formulate subgroup shift detection in the framework of statistical hypothesis testing and show that recent state-of-the-art statistical tests can be effectively applied to subgroup shift detection on medical imaging data. We provide synthetic experiments as well as extensive evaluation on clinically meaningful subgroup shifts on histopathology as well as retinal fundus images. We conclude that classifier-based subgroup shift detection tests could be a particularly useful tool for post-market surveillance of deployed ML systems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2023.

Builds on

14 of 25 references.

References · 14

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
  3. 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,245
  4. 2016Revisiting Classifier Two-Sample Testscited by 268
  5. 2022OpenOOD: Benchmarking Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 268
  6. 2018Failing Loudly: An Empirical Study of Methods for Detecting Dataset Shiftcited by 243
  7. 2019Hidden Stratification Causes Clinically Meaningful Failures in Machine Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 216
  8. 2022Domino: Discovering Systematic Errors with Cross-Modal Embeddingscited by 156
  9. 2020Learning Deep Kernels for Non-Parametric Two-Sample Testscited by 130
  10. 2016Generative Models and Model Criticism via Optimized Maximum Mean Discrepancycited by 100
  11. 2022Distilling Model Failures as Directions in Latent Spacecited by 82
  12. 2019Classification Logit Two-sample Testing by Neural Networkscited by 26
2 more
  1. 2022AutoML Two-Sample Testcited by 20
  2. 2021Identifying the key components in ResNet-50 for diabetic retinopathy grading from fundus images: a systematic investigationcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.