Automatic Debiased Learning from Positive, Unlabeled, and Exposure Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We address the issue of binary classification from positive and unlabeled data (PU classification) with a selection bias in the positive data. During the observation process, (i) a sample is exposed to a user, (ii) the user then returns the label for the exposed sample, and (iii) we however can only observe the positive samples. Therefore, the positive labels that we observe are a combination of both the exposure and the labeling, which creates a selection bias problem for the observed positive samples. This scenario represents a conceptual framework for many practical applications, such as recommender systems, which we refer to as ``learning from positive, unlabeled, and exposure data'' (PUE classification). To tackle this problem, we initially assume access to data with exposure labels. Then, we propose a method to identify the function of interest using a strong ignorability assumption and develop an ``Automatic Debiased PUE'' (ADPUE) learning method. This algorithm directly debiases the selection bias without requiring intermediate estimates, such as the propensity score, which is necessary for other learning methods. Through experiments, we demonstrate that our approach outperforms traditional PU learning methods on various semi-synthetic datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2023.
Builds on
13 of 38 references.
References · 13
- 2016Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluationcited by 246
- 2018Learning from positive and unlabeled data: a surveycited by 218
- 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 217
- 2016Unbiased Learning-to-Rank with Biased Feedbackcited by 155
- 2019Unbiased Recommender Learning from Missing-Not-At-Random Implicit Feedbackcited by 79
- 2020Non-Negative Bregman Divergence Minimization for Deep Direct Density Ratio Estimationcited by 43
- 2016Theoretical Comparisons of Positive-Unlabeled Learning against Positive-Negative Learningcited by 41
- 2018Beyond the Selected Completely At Random Assumption for Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Datacited by 36
- 2018Classification from Positive, Unlabeled and Biased Negative Datacited by 34
- 2019Mitigating Overfitting in Supervised Classification from Two Unlabeled Datasets: A Consistent Risk Correction Approachcited by 29
- 2017Semi-Supervised AUC Optimization based on Positive-Unlabeled Learningcited by 19
- 2017Collaborative Filtering with Social Exposure: A Modular Approach to Social Recommendationcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.