mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Computational-level Analysis of Constraint Compliance for General Intelligence

arXiv 2303.04352 ↗First posted 8 Mar 2023cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Human behavior is conditioned by codes and norms that constrain action. Rules, ``manners,'' laws, and moral imperatives are examples of classes of constraints that govern human behavior. These systems of constraints are "messy:" individual constraints are often poorly defined, what constraints are relevant in a particular situation may be unknown or ambiguous, constraints interact and conflict with one another, and determining how to act within the bounds of the relevant constraints may be a significant challenge, especially when rapid decisions are needed. Despite such messiness, humans incorporate constraints in their decisions robustly and rapidly. General, artificially-intelligent agents must also be able to navigate the messiness of systems of real-world constraints in order to behave predictability and reliably. In this paper, we characterize sources of complexity in constraint processing for general agents and describe a computational-level analysis for such constraint compliance. We identify key algorithmic requirements based on the computational-level analysis and outline an initial, exploratory implementation of a general approach to constraint compliance.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2023.

Builds on

3 of 21 references.

References · 3

  1. 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 966
  2. 2017Thinking Fast and Slow: Optimization Decomposition Across Timescalescited by 60
  3. 2018Building Ethically Bounded AIcited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.