Multi-Head Multi-Loss Model Calibration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Delivering meaningful uncertainty estimates is essential for a successful deployment of machine learning models in the clinical practice. A central aspect of uncertainty quantification is the ability of a model to return predictions that are well-aligned with the actual probability of the model being correct, also known as model calibration. Although many methods have been proposed to improve calibration, no technique can match the simple, but expensive approach of training an ensemble of deep neural networks. In this paper we introduce a form of simplified ensembling that bypasses the costly training and inference of deep ensembles, yet it keeps its calibration capabilities. The idea is to replace the common linear classifier at the end of a network by a set of heads that are supervised with different loss functions to enforce diversity on their predictions. Specifically, each head is trained to minimize a weighted Cross-Entropy loss, but the weights are different among the different branches. We show that the resulting averaged predictions can achieve excellent calibration without sacrificing accuracy in two challenging datasets for histopathological and endoscopic image classification. Our experiments indicate that Multi-Head Multi-Loss classifiers are inherently well-calibrated, outperforming other recent calibration techniques and even challenging Deep Ensembles' performance. Code to reproduce our experiments can be found at urlhttps://github.com/agaldran/mhmlcalibration .
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2023.
Builds on
25 of 33 references.
References · 25
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
- 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 903
- 2014Deeply-Supervised Netscited by 364
- 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 359
- 2020Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Focal Losscited by 353
- 2019On Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networkscited by 304
- 2020MedMNIST Classification Decathlon: A Lightweight AutoML Benchmark for Medical Image Analysiscited by 206
- 2015Why M Heads are Better than One: Training a Diverse Ensemble of Deep Networkscited by 138
13 more
- 2022Quantifying Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: Are Conditional Entropy and Mutual Information Appropriate Measures?cited by 124
- 2020Local Temperature Scaling for Probability Calibrationcited by 95
- 2021The Devil is in the Margin: Margin-based Label Smoothing for Network Calibrationcited by 91
- 2022A Deeper Look into Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty Disentanglementcited by 87
- 2023Understanding metric-related pitfalls in image analysis validationcited by 57
- 2022A Stitch in Time Saves Nine: A Train-Time Regularizing Loss for Improved Neural Network Calibrationcited by 49
- 2021Hard Sample Aware Noise Robust Learning for Histopathology Image Classificationcited by 48
- 2020Improved Trainable Calibration Method for Neural Networks on Medical Imaging Classificationcited by 37
- 2021Spatially Varying Label Smoothing: Capturing Uncertainty from Expert Annotationscited by 31
- 2022Test-time Adaptation with Calibration of Medical Image Classification Nets for Label Distribution Shiftcited by 20
- 2021Orthogonal Ensemble Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 16
- 2022Analysis and Comparison of Classification Metricscited by 16
- 2022Failure Detection in Medical Image Classification: A Reality Check and Benchmarking Testbedcited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 4.
8 papers.
- 2023Dynamically Scaled Temperature in Self-Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 4
- 2025h-calibration: Rethinking Classifier Recalibration with Probabilistic Error-Bounded Objectivecited by 2
- 2024Data-Centric Label Smoothing for Explainable Glaucoma Screening from Eye Fundus Imagescited by 0
- 2025Beyond H&E: Unlocking Pathological Insights with Polarization Imagingcited by 0
- 2026Multi-Rater Calibrated Segmentation Modelscited by 0
- 2026ClinReadNet: A clinical reading-inspired network for low-dose abdominal CT image quality assessmentcited by 0
- 2026Covariance Last-Layer Ensembles: Function-Space Diversity for Efficient Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 0
- 2026Uncertainty quantification for trustworthy deep learning: Methods and measurescited by 0
- 2026Uncertainty quantification for trustworthy deep learning: Methods and measures30 Jul 2026
- 2026Covariance Last-Layer Ensembles: Function-Space Diversity for Efficient Uncertainty Quantification26 Jul 2026
- 2026ClinReadNet: A clinical reading-inspired network for low-dose abdominal CT image quality assessment9 Jun 2026
- 2026Multi-Rater Calibrated Segmentation Models4 May 2026
- 2025h-calibration: Rethinking Classifier Recalibration with Probabilistic Error-Bounded Objective22 Jun 2025
- 2025Beyond H&E: Unlocking Pathological Insights with Polarization Imaging5 Mar 2025
- 2024Data-Centric Label Smoothing for Explainable Glaucoma Screening from Eye Fundus Images6 Jun 2024
- 2023Dynamically Scaled Temperature in Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning2 Aug 2023