mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Aligning benchmark datasets for table structure recognition

arXiv 2303.00716 ↗First posted 1 Mar 2023cs.CV cs.LGcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Benchmark datasets for table structure recognition (TSR) must be carefully processed to ensure they are annotated consistently. However, even if a dataset's annotations are self-consistent, there may be significant inconsistency across datasets, which can harm the performance of models trained and evaluated on them. In this work, we show that aligning these benchmarksunicodex2014removing both errors and inconsistency between themunicodex2014improves model performance significantly. We demonstrate this through a data-centric approach where we adopt one model architecture, the Table Transformer (TATR), that we hold fixed throughout. Baseline exact match accuracy for TATR evaluated on the ICDAR-2013 benchmark is 65% when trained on PubTables-1M, 42% when trained on FinTabNet, and 69% combined. After reducing annotation mistakes and inter-dataset inconsistency, performance of TATR evaluated on ICDAR-2013 increases substantially to 75% when trained on PubTables-1M, 65% when trained on FinTabNet, and 81% combined. We show through ablations over the modification steps that canonicalization of the table annotations has a significantly positive effect on performance, while other choices balance necessary trade-offs that arise when deciding a benchmark dataset's final composition. Overall we believe our work has significant implications for benchmark design for TSR and potentially other tasks as well. Dataset processing and training code will be released at https://github.com/microsoft/table-transformer.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2023.

Builds on

16 of 27 references.

References · 16

  1. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  2. 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,265
  3. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
  4. 2021AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmarkcited by 340
  5. 2019Image-based table recognition: data, model, and evaluationcited by 233
  6. 2020Global Table Extractor (GTE): A Framework for Joint Table Identification and Cell Structure Recognition Using Visual Contextcited by 146
  7. 2021PubTables-1M: Towards comprehensive table extraction from unstructured documentscited by 122
  8. 2019TableBank: A Benchmark Dataset for Table Detection and Recognitioncited by 102
  9. 2021Reduced, Reused and Recycled: The Life of a Dataset in Machine Learning Researchcited by 100
  10. 2020CascadeTabNet: An approach for end to end table detection and structure recognition from image-based documentscited by 98
  11. 2022TableFormer: Table Structure Understanding with Transformerscited by 93
  12. 2019Complicated Table Structure Recognitioncited by 91
4 more
  1. 2021Neural Collaborative Graph Machines for Table Structure Recognitioncited by 30
  2. 2022GriTS: Grid table similarity metric for table structure recognitioncited by 27
  3. 2021Current Status and Performance Analysis of Table Recognition in Document Images with Deep Neural Networkscited by 18
  4. 2021Guided Table Structure Recognition through Anchor Optimizationcited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 7; 2026: 5.

15 papers.

Sort: