On the Importance of Feature Representation for Flood Mapping using Classical Machine Learning Approaches
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Climate change has increased the severity and frequency of weather disasters all around the world. Flood inundation mapping based on earth observation data can help in this context, by providing cheap and accurate maps depicting the area affected by a flood event to emergency-relief units in near-real-time. Building upon the recent development of the Sen1Floods11 dataset, which provides a limited amount of hand-labeled high-quality training data, this paper evaluates the potential of five traditional machine learning approaches such as gradient boosted decision trees, support vector machines or quadratic discriminant analysis. By performing a grid-search-based hyperparameter optimization on 23 feature spaces we can show that all considered classifiers are capable of outperforming the current state-of-the-art neural network-based approaches in terms of total IoU on their best-performing feature spaces. With total and mean IoU values of 0.8751 and 0.7031 compared to 0.70 and 0.5873 as the previous best-reported results, we show that a simple gradient boosting classifier can significantly improve over deep neural network based approaches, despite using less training data. Furthermore, an analysis of the regional distribution of the Sen1Floods11 dataset reveals a problem of spatial imbalance. We show that traditional machine learning models can learn this bias and argue that modified metric evaluations are required to counter artifacts due to spatial imbalance. Lastly, a qualitative analysis shows that this pixel-wise classifier provides highly-precise surface water classifications indicating that a good choice of a feature space and pixel-wise classification can generate high-quality flood maps using optical and SAR data. We make our code publicly available at: https://github.com/DFKI-Earth-And-Space-Applications/Flood_Mapping_Feature_Space_Importance
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2023.
Builds on
13 of 88 references.
References · 13
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
- 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
- 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,265
- 2020KiU-Net: Overcomplete Convolutional Architectures for Biomedical Image and Volumetric Segmentationcited by 32
- 2020Deep Robust Clustering by Contrastive Learningcited by 25
- 2022Multimodal contrastive learning for remote sensing taskscited by 18
- 2021Evaluating Self and Semi-Supervised Methods for Remote Sensing Segmentation Taskscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.