Two Views of Constrained Differential Privacy: Belief Revision and Update
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we provide two views of constrained differential private (DP) mechanisms. The first one is as belief revision. A constrained DP mechanism is obtained by standard probabilistic conditioning, and hence can be naturally implemented by Monte Carlo algorithms. The other is as belief update. A constrained DP is defined according to l2-distance minimization postprocessing or projection and hence can be naturally implemented by optimization algorithms. The main advantage of these two perspectives is that we can make full use of the machinery of belief revision and update to show basic properties for constrained differential privacy especially some important new composition properties. Within the framework established in this paper, constrained DP algorithms in the literature can be classified either as belief revision or belief update. At the end of the paper, we demonstrate their differences especially in utility in a couple of scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2023.
Builds on
8 of 34 references.
References · 8
- 2022Geographic Spines in the 2020 Census Disclosure Avoidance Systemcited by 42
- 2016PrivTree: A Differentially Private Algorithm for Hierarchical Decompositionscited by 22
- 2020Bias and Variance of Post-processing in Differential Privacycited by 14
- 2019Locally Differentially Private Frequency Estimation with Consistencycited by 9
- 2017Differential Privacy as a Causal Propertycited by 4
- 2020Congenial Differential Privacy under Mandated Disclosurecited by 3
- 2021Subspace Differential Privacycited by 3
- 2020Transparent Privacy is Principled Privacycited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.