mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Targeted demand response for flexible energy communities using clustering techniques

arXiv 2303.00186 ↗First posted 1 Mar 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The present study proposes clustering techniques for designing demand response (DR) programs for commercial and residential prosumers. The goal is to alter the consumption behavior of the prosumers within a distributed energy community in Italy. This aggregation aims to: a) minimize the reverse power flow at the primary substation, occuring when generation from solar panels in the local grid exceeds consumption, and b) shift the system wide peak demand, that typically occurs during late afternoon. Regarding the clustering stage, we consider daily prosumer load profiles and divide them across the extracted clusters. Three popular machine learning algorithms are employed, namely k-means, k-medoids and agglomerative clustering. We evaluate the methods using multiple metrics including a novel metric proposed within this study, namely peak performance score (PPS). The k-means algorithm with dynamic time warping distance considering 14 clusters exhibits the highest performance with a PPS of 0.689. Subsequently, we analyze each extracted cluster with respect to load shape, entropy, and load types. These characteristics are used to distinguish the clusters that have the potential to serve the optimization objectives by matching them to proper DR schemes including time of use, critical peak pricing, and real-time pricing. Our results confirm the effectiveness of the proposed clustering algorithm in generating meaningful flexibility clusters, while the derived DR pricing policy encourages consumption during off-peak hours. The developed methodology is robust to the low availability and quality of training datasets and can be used by aggregator companies for segmenting energy communities and developing personalized DR policies.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2023.

Builds on

3 of 61 references.

References · 3

  1. 2023A comparative assessment of deep learning models for day-ahead load forecasting: Investigating key accuracy driverscited by 6
  2. 2023In Search of Deep Learning Architectures for Load Forecasting: A Comparative Analysis and the Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Model Performancecited by 5
  3. 2016Residential Demand Response Targeting Using Machine Learning with Observational Datacited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

5 papers.