mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dr ChatGPT, tell me what I want to hear: How prompt knowledge impacts health answer correctness

arXiv 2302.13793 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2023cs.CL cs.AI cs.IRcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative pre-trained language models (GPLMs) like ChatGPT encode in the model's parameters knowledge the models observe during the pre-training phase. This knowledge is then used at inference to address the task specified by the user in their prompt. For example, for the question-answering task, the GPLMs leverage the knowledge and linguistic patterns learned at training to produce an answer to a user question. Aside from the knowledge encoded in the model itself, answers produced by GPLMs can also leverage knowledge provided in the prompts. For example, a GPLM can be integrated into a retrieve-then-generate paradigm where a search engine is used to retrieve documents relevant to the question; the content of the documents is then transferred to the GPLM via the prompt. In this paper we study the differences in answer correctness generated by ChatGPT when leveraging the model's knowledge alone vs. in combination with the prompt knowledge. We study this in the context of consumers seeking health advice from the model. Aside from measuring the effectiveness of ChatGPT in this context, we show that the knowledge passed in the prompt can overturn the knowledge encoded in the model and this is, in our experiments, to the detriment of answer correctness. This work has important implications for the development of more robust and transparent question-answering systems based on generative pre-trained language models.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2023.

Builds on

10 of 15 references.

References · 10

  1. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
  2. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
  3. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  4. 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,371
  5. 2023A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivitycited by 888
  6. 2017Reading Wikipedia to Answer Open-Domain Questionscited by 777
  7. 2022Teaching language models to support answers with verified quotescited by 290
  8. 2021Measuring Attribution in Natural Language Generation Modelscited by 253
  9. 2022Attributed Question Answering: Evaluation and Modeling for Attributed Large Language Modelscited by 108
  10. 2023Putting ChatGPT's Medical Advice to the (Turing) Testcited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 13; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: