mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Navigating Multi-Stakeholder Incentives and Preferences: Co-Designing Alternatives for the Future of Gig Worker Well-Being

arXiv 2302.13436 ↗First posted 26 Feb 2023cs.HCcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Gig workers, and the products and services they provide, play an increasingly ubiquitous role in our daily lives. But despite growing evidence suggesting that worker well-being in gig economy platforms have become significant societal problems, few studies have investigated possible solutions. We take a stride in this direction by engaging workers, platform employees, and local regulators in a series of speed dating workshops using storyboards based on real-life situations to rapidly elicit stakeholder preferences for addressing financial, physical, and social issues related to worker well-being. Our results reveal that existing public and platformic infrastructures fall short in providing workers with resources needed to perform gigs, surfacing a need for multi-platform collaborations, technological innovations, as well as changes in regulations, labor laws, and the public's perception of gig workers, among others. Drawing from multi-stakeholder findings, we discuss these implications for technology, policy, and service as well as avenues for collaboration.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2023.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.