Machine Learning based prediction of Glucose Levels in Type 1 Diabetes Patients with the use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A task of vital clinical importance, within Diabetes management, is the prevention of hypo/hyperglycemic events. Increasingly adopted Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) devices offer detailed, non-intrusive and real time insights into a patient's blood glucose concentrations. Leveraging advanced Machine Learning (ML) Models as methods of prediction of future glucose levels, gives rise to substantial quality of life improvements, as well as providing a vital tool for monitoring diabetes. A regression based prediction approach is implemented recursively, with a series of Machine Learning Models: Linear Regression, Hidden Markov Model, Long-Short Term Memory Network. By exploiting a patient's past 11 hours of blood glucose (BG) concentration measurements, a prediction of the 60 minutes is made. Results will be assessed using performance metrics including: Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), normalised energy of the second-order differences (ESOD) and F1 score. Research of past and current approaches, as well as available dataset, led to the establishment of an optimal training methodology for the CITY dataset, which may be leveraged by future model development. Performance was aligned with similar state-of-art ML models, with LSTM having RMSE of 28.55, however no significant advantage was observed over classical Auto-regressive AR models. Compelling insights into LSTM prediction behaviour could increase public and legislative trust and understanding, progressing the certification of ML models in Artificial Pancreas Systems (APS).
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2023.
Builds on
18 of 81 references.
References · 18
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
- 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
- 2018Fundamentals of Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Networkcited by 415
- 2014Long Short-Term Memory Based Recurrent Neural Network Architectures for Large Vocabulary Speech Recognitioncited by 111
- 2017Explaining Recurrent Neural Network Predictions in Sentiment Analysiscited by 87
- 2014Differential Privacy and Machine Learning: a Survey and Reviewcited by 66
- 2015Learning Natural Language Inference with LSTMcited by 51
- 2018The unreasonable effectiveness of the forget gatecited by 32
- 2015Fast and Accurate Recurrent Neural Network Acoustic Models for Speech Recognitioncited by 26
6 more
- 2019Explaining and Interpreting LSTMscited by 23
- 2016Quantifying the vanishing gradient and long distance dependency problem in recursive neural networks and recursive LSTMscited by 21
- 2019DP-LSTM: Differential Privacy-inspired LSTM for Stock Prediction Using Financial Newscited by 11
- 2019A dual mode adaptive basal-bolus advisor based on reinforcement learningcited by 8
- 2021Stacked LSTM Based Deep Recurrent Neural Network with Kalman Smoothing for Blood Glucose Predictioncited by 8
- 2020Comparative Analysis of the Hidden Markov Model and LSTM: A Simulative Approachcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.