mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MesoGraph: Automatic Profiling of Malignant Mesothelioma Subtypes from Histological Images

arXiv 2302.12653 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2023cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Malignant mesothelioma is classified into three histological subtypes, Epithelioid, Sarcomatoid, and Biphasic according to the relative proportions of epithelioid and sarcomatoid tumor cells present. Biphasic tumors display significant populations of both cell types. This subtyping is subjective and limited by current diagnostic guidelines and can differ even between expert thoracic pathologists when characterising the continuum of relative proportions of epithelioid and sarcomatoid components using a three class system. In this work, we develop a novel dual-task Graph Neural Network (GNN) architecture with ranking loss to learn a model capable of scoring regions of tissue down to cellular resolution. This allows quantitative profiling of a tumor sample according to the aggregate sarcomatoid association score of all the cells in the sample. The proposed approach uses only core-level labels and frames the prediction task as a dual multiple instance learning (MIL) problem. Tissue is represented by a cell graph with both cell-level morphological and regional features. We use an external multi-centric test set from Mesobank, on which we demonstrate the predictive performance of our model. We validate our model predictions through an analysis of the typical morphological features of cells according to their predicted score, finding that some of the morphological differences identified by our model match known differences used by pathologists. We further show that the model score is predictive of patient survival with a hazard ratio of 2.30. The code for the proposed approach, along with the dataset, is available at: https://github.com/measty/MesoGraph.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2023.

Builds on

13 of 35 references.

References · 13

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  3. 2018Dynamic Graph CNN for Learning on Point Cloudscited by 2,223
  4. 2018Representation Learning on Graphs with Jumping Knowledge Networkscited by 877
  5. 2020Data Efficient and Weakly Supervised Computational Pathology on Whole Slide Imagescited by 745
  6. 2019GNNExplainer: Generating Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 737
  7. 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 629
  8. 2020Dual-stream Multiple Instance Learning Network for Whole Slide Image Classification with Self-supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 478
  9. 2018HoVer-Net: Simultaneous Segmentation and Classification of Nuclei in Multi-Tissue Histology Imagescited by 388
  10. 2018Cell Detection with Star-convex Polygonscited by 183
  11. 2018Classification and Disease Localization in Histopathology Using Only Global Labels: A Weakly-Supervised Approachcited by 33
  12. 2021SlideGraph+: Whole Slide Image Level Graphs to Predict HER2Status in Breast Cancercited by 31
1 more
  1. 2019Weakly Supervised Prostate TMA Classification via Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 17

Built on by

Not cited yet.