mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Q-Flow: Generative Modeling for Differential Equations of Open Quantum Dynamics with Normalizing Flows

arXiv 2302.12235 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2023quant-ph cond-mat.dis-nn cond-mat.quant-gascited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Studying the dynamics of open quantum systems can enable breakthroughs both in fundamental physics and applications to quantum engineering and quantum computation. Since the density matrix ρ, which is the fundamental description for the dynamics of such systems, is high-dimensional, customized deep generative neural networks have been instrumental in modeling ρ. However, the complex-valued nature and normalization constraints of ρ, as well as its complicated dynamics, prohibit a seamless connection between open quantum systems and the recent advances in deep generative modeling. Here we lift that limitation by utilizing a reformulation of open quantum system dynamics to a partial differential equation (PDE) for a corresponding probability distribution Q, the Husimi Q function. Thus, we model the Q function seamlessly with off-the-shelf deep generative models such as normalizing flows. Additionally, we develop novel methods for learning normalizing flow evolution governed by high-dimensional PDEs based on the Euler method and the application of the time-dependent variational principle. We name the resulting approach Q-Flow and demonstrate the scalability and efficiency of Q-Flow on open quantum system simulations, including the dissipative harmonic oscillator and the dissipative bosonic model. Q-Flow is superior to conventional PDE solvers and state-of-the-art physics-informed neural network solvers, especially in high-dimensional systems.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2023.

Builds on

20 of 64 references.

References · 20

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
  3. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
  4. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
  5. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,545
  6. 2014NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimationcited by 1,058
  7. 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
  8. 2019Monte Carlo Gradient Estimation in Machine Learningcited by 283
  9. 2020AdaBelief Optimizer: Adapting Stepsizes by the Belief in Observed Gradientscited by 283
  10. 2018Deep Hidden Physics Models: Deep Learning of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 235
  11. 2019Ab-Initio Solution of the Many-Electron Schr"odinger Equation with Deep Neural Networkscited by 200
  12. 2019Deep neural network solution of the electronic Schr"odinger equationcited by 127
8 more
  1. 2020Convex Potential Flows: Universal Probability Distributions with Optimal Transport and Convex Optimizationcited by 90
  2. 2020Algorithms for Solving High Dimensional PDEs: From Nonlinear Monte Carlo to Machine Learningcited by 77
  3. 2019Deep autoregressive models for the efficient variational simulation of many-body quantum systemscited by 64
  4. 2018Data-driven discovery of PDEs in complex datasetscited by 42
  5. 2021NetKet 3: Machine Learning Toolbox for Many-Body Quantum Systemscited by 28
  6. 2022Gauge Equivariant Neural Networks for 2+1D U(1) Gauge Theory Simulations in Hamiltonian Formulationcited by 11
  7. 2022Simulating 2+1D Lattice Quantum Electrodynamics at Finite Density with Neural Flow Wavefunctionscited by 10
  8. 2022Variational Monte Carlo Approach to Partial Differential Equations with Neural Networkscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

4 papers.